LCD or Plasma ?

[NNN2004]

souixan said:

GooseGaws said:

NJ5 said:
DON'T buy a Plasma. Plasmas use a lot more electricity than LCDs, and energy prices are increasing a lot. It's very possible prices will get even worse, you will want to have as few energy-guzzlers as possible in your house.

Power usages vary wildly between makes and models; some LCDs use virtually as much power as plasmas at the same screen size.  Really, if someone is buying a $2000 TV, they can probably afford a few extra watts to power it.

 

 

Actually the average LCD today with the LED or CFL lamps use considerably less power than a plasma. My LCD 32" uses about 120 Watts(though the specs say 180...I can't figure that out) of electricity though that's not the only thing you should note. You can figure out electric consumption through a mathematical equation using Amps and Watts. I forget the exact equation but I use a device called Save-a-watt that monitors electrical use through outlets.

At random, I took specs for two 42″ plasma sets; a Panasonic model is rated at 395 watts, and an LG model at 329 watts. Two 42″ LCD sets selected at random are a Sharp model rated at 247 watts, and an LG model rated at 210 watts.

Edit: My mistake the figure is
Voltage(volts) x Current(amps) = Wattage.
Wattage (Power) x Time = Energy Use (watt hours) then you take the energy use
watt-hours per day x (1 kilowatt/1000 watts) = kilowatt-hours per day
kilowatt-hours x your electric companies price and you can figure your energy bill

 

 i dont care about power and i dont have problem with power consume but i need the one with the best picture quality .... the problem that i want high a resolution and a 0 pixel response so can i have it in one TV ?