Hasn't the topic of 360 having a more developer friendly architecture than the ps3 been said, done, beaten, killed, beaten, resurrected, beaten, died again, and beaten so many times???
Yes the 360 has a better architecture for better stressless development. Does anyone else remember dev's bitching about ps2 being a hell hole to develop on shortly after launch??? This shit takes time! SONY has always seemed to make huge differences with the release of each console. Huge more complex differences. Yes, 360 has a better GPU, but PS3 has a better but harder to code for CPU. They both are stuck at 512MB of RAM but 50% of the ps3's ram moves over 4X faster than 100% of the 360's Ram, while the other half moves at the same speed of the 360's.
All of this means nothin right now, wait 3 more years for dev's to tell you wich console they rather develop for to make a huge and amazing game. Assuming that the 360 doesn't get replaced by MS b4 then....
4 ≈ One
