Forbes: Nintendo`s Game May Be Over

[Ajax]

famousringo said:

Ajax said:

famousringo said:

Ajax said:

they were quite right actually, cause the GC turned out to get the last place, and MS beated Nintendo even without having a Japanese market; so it's not fanboyish at all

 

And then you look at the profits (or losses) that these companies earned in the videogame market, and know who's really a winner and who's really a loser.

 

Where does this article mention that Nintendo won't make a profit? Where did I mention anything about Nintendo being also third in matters of profit?

 

What's the point of marketshare? You can leverage it to get profit. Unless of course it costs you so much money to get that marketshare that you can't earn it back in profits.

Forbes is a financial magazine. Of course profit is relevant.

Of course you can make the assumption that because it's a financial magazine that they must have ment 'last place' in terms of profit. But certainly the text doesn't state that, wether your assumption is right or not. But if you really wan't it to mean last in terms of profit, which the text doesn't say, but because of your 'knowledge' of Forbes, go ahead. I don't know what the guy that wrote this article was thinking that day. I've only got these words on my screen.