JaggedSac said:
I wasn't impressed with Resistance 2. That big monster battle was not very good. The thing was incredibly slow and seemed to just look at you. It picked you up a couple of times and you shoot it in the mouth and it puts you down. Really lame. I was, however, impressed with KZ 2. The graphics looks great and the shooting looked great too.
|
Yeah, I have to agree with that one. However, it's still going to be ~3 months before the game comes out and we are talking about Insomniac here so you never know what the actual game will look like.
OT: What I would like to see in Halo 4 (or whatever it's called) is 10-12 player co-op with 64-player online matches and a single-player campaign that doesn't totally suck. I don't know if it's a fact, but it seems to me that a lot of the reason Halo sells so well is because of it's awesome storyline, which is better than Star Trek and possibly even better than Star Wars. This is not to say that Halo games don't have good multi-player, but I can hardly imagine that nearly 10 million people bought Halo 3 only because of it's multi-player, which is clearly inferior to CoD4's offering. I think M$ (and possible Bungie) may have lost sight of this important fact. If they make a great multi-player/co-op game, but sacrifice the single player, they are walking away from the aspect of the game that makes it great. I just hope they don't do that.
Not trying to be a fanboy. Of course, it's hard when you own the best console eve... dang it
