Does anyone else get the impression that she is either not particularly good at her job or she is inexperienced?
Most of the questions she seemed to struggle with should have been anticipated before they gave their E3 presentation, and certainly after the response the presentation received on the internet. Now, unless you know it is a complete lie (which I don't think it would be) the correct way to answer the questions about their core game line-up is:
"At Nintendo we have been focusing more on delivering a more focused message at our presentations, and releasing information about games when the games are ready at a venue which is appropriate for the game. Between internal Nintendo development teams and third party developers there are a lot of games which will be of particular interest to the 'Core' gamer that will be announced in the near future."
Now, much like political double speak, this says something which is overly generic and can be twisted to mean (practically) anything; but it comes across far better than telling gamers to continue playing games they already own (which, if you understand a lot of core gamers, most of them have completed) and to mention games which they have already seemed to reject (regardless of whether they should have).
