Over at gamerankings they allow anti Sony sites to review Sony games and they post their results, GamesTM is anti Sony mag and they rank all sony games below average, games higher then average 2, games lower then average 28.  Why does GR allow sites to post this nonsense.

Eh, for gamerankings to be able to screw anything over, people have to care about them.

Can we have a show of hands to see who makes their major purchases based solely on gamerankings scores?

I think the same. Why Gamespot and 1up scores are counted for Wii games?

:)

don't be so mad, NTSC uk gave Metroid Prime 3 a 60.

I agree that gamerankings should stop using a lot of crappy sites for their averages... but what can we do, most people agree that R&C and Metroid Prime 3 both are 90+ games and thats enough for me

It looks like gamesTM is just a harsh reviewer. On average, they rate games 11% lower than the average score. Based on their GameRankings stats, they do seem to be slightly harsher on the PS3 but not really any more than the platform bias seen on several more popular reviewers.

They also gave Super Mario Galaxy a 9, its lowest score so far. I think it's safe to say that this magazine brings down the average on most games. It's just one reviewer of many though.

Gamerrankings is just a convenient way to see all the reviews in 1 place. I think is great.