By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Never call GeoW or Epic original

infamous8 said:
isnt a higher selling series than MGS.

MGS has longevity.... This is MGS's 3rd generation in 3D.... Let's see if Gears will still be selling 5 million 2 generations from now. I really doubt it.

... why?



Around the Network
Phrancheyez said:
infamous8 said:
Gears isnt a higher selling series than MGS.

MGS has longevity.... This is MGS's 3rd generation in 3D.... Let's see if Gears will still be selling 5 million 2 generations from now. I really doubt it.

I really don't doubt it. And I don't even like Gears.


I do. Things change. People change. User bases change.

 

Fans of games grow older and lose interest. For example: an 18 year old who bought MGS on the original PlayStation would've been 28 years old when MGS4 came out for Ps3... 28 years old with a full time job, wife and kids, and no longer playing video games anymore... get it?

 

 

 



"I don't have time to play video games anymore, but if I did, I would definitely choose the PlayStation 3 instead of the 360" - President Barack Obama

infamous8 said:
Explain why they would make the title SO CLOSE to God of War....

They couldve named it Gears IN War or Gears AT War... Those would make more sense. It's a blatant rip off.

What's next??? Metal Uncharted Solid!!! And you guys would defend that and say it's not a rip off?

Maybe because "Gears of War" sounds the coolest? Think about it. They're soldiers. They are what makes a war work, and they are what keeps a war going. So long as there are soldiers, there can be war. Gears are also part of machines, and they help the machine to work. I'm trying to explain this as simply as possible for you, since apparently you don't get the picture. It's a pun. "Gears in War" would have ruined the pun and not made any sense. Also, it would have sounded stupid. Same for "Gears at War."

I can't believe you're getting so hung up on something so trivial, when you clearly don't know what you're talking about.



 

 

coolbeans said:
Is there a way to save this thread or bookmark it (can't find the option)? Wanna put this on a thread I may make in the future: "Dumbest VGChartz threads for '09", 'cause this one certainly made the preliminaries ;).

Do it. If it wins, I might get a citation for all the ownage I'm dishing out.



 

 

... as if "god of war" is an original title anyway



Around the Network
MontanaHatchet said:
infamous8 said:
Explain why they would make the title SO CLOSE to God of War....

They couldve named it Gears IN War or Gears AT War... Those would make more sense. It's a blatant rip off.

What's next??? Metal Uncharted Solid!!! And you guys would defend that and say it's not a rip off?

Maybe because "Gears of War" sounds the coolest? Think about it. They're soldiers. They are what makes a war work, and they are what keeps a war going. So long as there are soldiers, there can be war. Gears are also part of machines, and they help the machine to work. I'm trying to explain this as simply as possible for you, since apparently you don't get the picture. It's a pun. "Gears in War" would have ruined the pun and not made any sense. Also, it would have sounded stupid. Same for "Gears at War."

I can't believe you're getting so hung up on something so trivial, when you clearly don't know what you're talking about.


Epic employee 1: Hmmm what should we name this shooter we got coming up....?

 

Epic employee 2: I dont know...Look at how Sony is titling there games.....God of War sounds awesome...

 

Epic employee: 1: Yeah, but our characters arent Gods...

 

Epic employee 2: ummm, well... Metal Gear Solid sounds cool too...

 

Epic employee 1: *face palm*

 

Epic employee 2: I GOT IT! How about we call the soliders Gears! Then we can name it GEARS OF WAR!!!

 

Epic employee 1: Genius.....

 



"I don't have time to play video games anymore, but if I did, I would definitely choose the PlayStation 3 instead of the 360" - President Barack Obama

Montana is pretty much hit the nail right on the head. They are called Gears, they fight in a War. Hence. Gears of War, what's to complain about? It's a name. Out of everything people judge games in, a name is usually the very last thing people judge.

I'm surprised this thread has lasted this long. Someone lock this. It's nothing but flame bait.



Why must JRPG female leads suck so bad?

Hey, thanks for ignoring everything I said! Keep dishing out that hilarious shtick, you're a regular Seinfeld.



 

 

coolbeans said:
Is there a way to save this thread or bookmark it (can't find the option)? Wanna put this on a thread I may make in the future: "Dumbest VGChartz threads for '09", 'cause this one certainly made the preliminaries ;).

This is infamous8. All his threads are stupid. You might as well make a folder just for stupid infamous8 threads



1.

It is called "Gears" as a play on words concerning the word "COG" which stands for the "Coalition of Organised Governments."

Edit: For those still not getting it, 'Gears' have 'COGs' on them.



2.

Fans had been calling to battle and ride Brumaks since right after the release of the first Gears. You cannot change a MAJOR scene from a game just a few months before release.

3.

Too this day, Gears 1/2 pull off this cover system better than any other game with a similar one. That is why they are praised.

4.

Seriously, just leave the forums for a week or two and cool off. The Microsoft hating and Sony humping is getting psycho.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS