Maynard_Tool said:
noname2200 said: What makes you think it's not a remake? It's got the same characters as the original (at least, all we've seen is familiar faces so far), and everything I've read about it calls it a "reimagining" of the original. Keep in mind that there WILL be changes, but at its base the Wii game appears to be a remade version of the NES title.
And that's AWESOME. |
So, all the mortal kombats, street fighters and even smash, count as remake??? Just b/c it has old characters, doesn't mean it's a remake. Plus it's been already confirm that is NOT a remake. Nintendo said it was a new game.
|
Not in the least, but then the sequels to those games added new characters (and occasionally took old ones away), new stages, etc. Is that the case here? Honest question, mind you, because I've yet to hear that it is. From where I'm standing, it looks like the original Punch-Out with better graphics, a new multiplayer mode, and some tweaks.
Look at it this way: under your reasoning, Resident Evil on the Gamecube was NOT a remake because it has stuff that the original didn't. We know that's not the case, of course. In fact, I venture that aside from adding multiplayer the REmake had more dramatic changes between the original game and its modern reimagining. The only thing that favors NOT calling Punch-Out!! a remake is that Nintendo said it's a "new game," but they've yet to show me any reason why "remake" shouldn't apply.
Keep in mind that I'm hardly insulting the game by calling it a remake. Remakes can be great (see: REmake, Klonoa, most likely Boy and His Blob, and tons more). I know that has a negative connotation in some folks' mind (nevermind that most of 'em never played the original), which is likely why Nintendo's taken the tack it has, but as near as I can tell this is, in fact a remake. Care to change my mind? I'm all ears.
Valkyria00 said:
What fighting game doesnt keep its characters? What of new fighting games isnt somewhat based on its predecessor?
Its a new game in the series.
|
See above.