Paul_Warren said: Okay if I accept the Wii as 7th gen console, will you please post a list of its technical stats compared to the PS3 and 360? |
If they were available for public release, I would do that but we don't have an official spec sheet on Wii becaue Nintnedo never provided one. All the specs we see about the CPU and GPU are just assumptions (well ground assumptiosn but still not officially known).
Besides, it's blatantly obvious the Wii was not developed to compete graphically with the X360 and PS3 but as we've discussed that is not the metric that qualifies inclusion in a generation.
However, there are many technical aspects about the Wii that are highly advanced from the 6th generation.
1. 90 nm chipset. (All 3 last gen consoles were 180 nm...I'm sure you know smaller is better)
2. Built in 802.11 b/g Wifi. (Nothing had built in Wifi last gen and X360 doesn't even have it now)
3. Multi-dimensional slot loading disc drive. (All 3 last gen were eitehr tray or top loading and the Wii is one of the only slot drives in the world that accepts 2 disc sizes).
4. SD cards. (none of the 3 consoles last generation supported them)
5. Utilizes both 1T-SRAM and GDDR3 RAM.....GDDR3 is the same RAM used in the fastest nVidia graphics cards. (The Xbox used standard DDR RAM and the PS2 used old RDRAM)
6. Power consumption reduced to 18 watts on and 1.3 watts in standby with WiiConnect24 off and 9.6 watts with it on. (PS2 - 45 watts | Xbox - 100 watts)
7. WiiConnect24 allows updates and data transfer from standby mode. (Xbox had to on and logged on to Live to update anything)
And that's not even touching the controller technology. The Wii's technological advancements didn't go towards graphics and pure processing speed but efficienty and input methods. It's actually a high advanced peice fo technology, it's just not advanced in the same direction as PS3/X360 but on the other side of that same token, the PS3/X360 are not advanced as Wii in its directions.