I think that some things have been misunderstood.
"Section 8.1" is not an 'elitist' site or anything like that, but it's a way to cut through most of the BS threads and posts that clutter this site up, and people are able to get to know each other without having a fight over which version of GTA IV is better, or how third-party Wii games don't sell...
At least that's how it started. But then, we all found out how well we meshed. We're all cool, and there's no arguments or anything of the like, not saying that they are here, at Section 8.2, but we've gotten quite used to the site. Also, Section 8.2 is moving very slowly, there's only ever a post or two over the course of a couple of hours, not very stimulating conversation if you ask me.
And there's no poaching or anything else going on, it's not like we post there, and have forgotten all about VGC, that has not been the case. I can only speak for myself, but I've been as active as ever on VGC, while still being part of "Section 8.1". If the policy is not being able to tell other people about another site, then how would VGC have grown? A lot of our members are people from NeoGaf or Gametrailers, etc, and many threads about VGC, imploring people to come are on both of those sites, IIRC.
Frankly, it feels like you are the 'elitist' one here. Like we are unable to be a part of another forum whilst being a part of this forum, if that's the case, then most of the forum would be gone. I'm a member of two or three other forums (Excluding "Section 8.1"), so what, am I banned for not being an exclusive member of this site?
Also, I don't know what was the problem with the post you pulled from Section 8.1. It wasn't speaking of VGC in a derogatory manner or anything, s/he thanked you for answering the requests, so I don't see the problem there. Also, it's quite hypocritical to call the creator/people of "Section 8.1" 'elitist' when you have put a cap so that people with >750 posts can view this content. Isn't that elitist? Who is to say that someone with 100 posts, can post better than someone with 10000 *cough*leo-j*cough*. You yourself has turned VGC elitist, by putting that cap on here.
So we've drawn the conclusion that Section 8.2 (VGC) is elitist. What to do? You can take the >750 cap off, but then it may as well be an open forum, and the reason for Section 8 still lives, a place to cut the BS and get to know each other better. Or you can get rid of Section 8.2 altogether, but then "Section 8.1" has even more reason to exist. You could ban all of the parties involved, but 1/2 of your moderating staff would go along with us.
I say all that to say, there's nothing that needs to be done. Section 8.2 will continue to live on, and all parties involved want it that way. There is nothing you can really do, without keeping Section 8 alive, or banning 50 people, including your moderating staff, which is unnecessary, since all members of "Section 8.1" still post regularly. There is no big deal with keeping the site up, and I believe that it's been take out of context.
On a more personal note, I'm very disappointed in you ioi, I fail to see the logic in making a public thread about getting rid of "Section 8.1", instead of PMing Kenzo about it. It makes no sense to me. Especially with the logic that you know that Kenzo is the creator. Why would you bring people to public scrutiny, rather than deal with this behind closed doors? It goes directly against what we as posters are able to do. When we had the whole "fight the mods" time a few months ago, and everyone was trying to hate those in power, making threads demeaning mods or problems posters have had with them was specifically forbade, but this is doing the same thing, turning a public affair private.