Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:
Isn't flawed.
Would be like saying Sony/MS were competing on the 100m and Wii on the 400m. Wii winning and making the best mark ever on their event doesn't affect the fact of the dispute of Sony/MS.
But yes Wii was the most successful among the consoles and DS the most successful HW of the gen.
If the graphics isn't better the most powerful specs would be useless.
|
Again, analogy was bad given Wii had success in sales and profit. Your analogy was one sold better but another made more money. Just read what you said.
I consider resolution and performance as an element of graphics. So if Series X has the rumored 12TF, it will certainly help many games achieve 60 fps, while raising the bar in visuals and maintain a high resolution.
|
You understood it wrong then. I wasn't making an analogy to Wii in that. I was saying that on the olympic event the winner is whoever finished first even if the third had made more money. Because the question was that there can be more than one winner depending on the metric.
Then I explained why Wii winning didn't impacted the competition between PS/MS since in that gen Wii wasn't really competing with both.
If PS5 is 9Tf and XSX is 12TF then it should have better graphics across the board (that is why I was confused when you were seemingly implying that better HW doesn't mean better graphics), with the fold on if PS5 games look better than XSX (let's say because of crossgame, don't think it would happen with 30% power difference, but for guess sake let's pretend) then the specs advantage of XSX would be meaningless (as was on discussions of X360 vs PS3 that for most of the gen the ports for X360 looked better so PS3 being slightly more powerful was meaningless for most customers).
eva01beserk said:
DonFerrari said:
Actually power was always the thing of Xbox.
Original Xbox was the most powerful on the gen, X360 is close to PS3 in power and coming one year early that meant they were trying to be the most powerful again, X1 Don said it was impossible that they would ever let PS4 be 30% more powerful (and he was lying through and through since the systems were already revealed and the power difference was know), X1X was launched a year after PS4Pro to ensure they would be a lot more powerful, they are also touting the power of XSX (which leakers said are very near PS5 in power but haven't said which is stronger and other leakers say it is 30% stronger).
|
Maybe. But if I remember correctly they never made such forcefull advertisement of power since xbox one x. It's like every time xbox gets mentioned they have to add "most powerful console". They have nothing else so it makes sense thats what they flaunt.
|
I see, well that I can't confront because Xbox original and even launch X360 I didn't see any marketing in Brazil. X1 I saw the comments from Don but really don't remember seeing they saying it was more powerful in marketing, perhaps they used the standard "better than last gen, improvement, etc".
But yes X1X they were pretty clear on marketing for the most powerful console ever.