By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - MS: 1st party Xbox games will be cross-gen for "next year, two years"

Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

eeeer no, they haven't said anything about releasing crossgen for two years after PS5 debut. Sure you may say several of their studios won't have games ready in the first 2 years, but that isn't the same thing.

Different strategies, simular results in the end.

Radek said:

Imagine a PC game being made for running on GTX 660 and i3 as minimum requirement and then imagine PC game being made for running with GTX 1060, SSD and Ryzen 5 as minimum requirement.

Even at 1440p or 4K which one do you think will have higher quality graphics and more complex AI and physics (despite of resolution)

And I was being generous with GTX 660 as Xbox One has something even less powerful, GTX 660 is PS4 level GPU.

I mean come on, it's 2020 and even $150 GTX 1650 Super is faster than PS4 Pro 4.2 Tflops GPU!

I'm playing Gears 5 and it runs great on my new RX 5700 XT, Ultra details and 4K I'm getting 60 fps, but if that game was designed with only Xbox One X in mind, I wouldn't be getting more than 30 fps in 4K on ultra and the game would look next gen already.

And Xbox One X is already less powerful than Lockhart even will be, I wish Xbox One X became the lowest available Xbox for 2020-2022 games.

So when games like God of War were made, it wasnt held back by PS4 hardware when RTX-2080 GPUs were on the market? God of War still turned out pretty and so did Gears 5, lets also add TLOU2. It doesn't seem like older limited hardware is affecting the bigger AAA game developments and companie's vision.

A good developer will create a good game regardless of console limitations and BOTW is a perfect example of that.

Games can always look better regardless if they choose to use the latest console.

That doesn't even make sense. God of War and TLOU2 were build from the ground up around the limitations of the ps4. If those games would also have been released on ps3, they would have been far less spectacular.

I mean, lets say Valve decided to release Half Life 3, and it would be completely optimized and only run on a RTX 2080 with SSD, just imagine what that would look like. Unfortunately, there are not many AAA developers left that make games that really push the latest pc hardware, instead pc gamers get the same experience as on consoles and all the extra horsepower goes to waste by simply raising the fps, resolution and some graphical setting that don't really add anything to the games. It will be the exact same thing with all of the exclusives on the Xbox SeriesX, while Sony will drop a couple of 1st party bombs that will probably make Halo Infinite look like a last gen game.   



Around the Network
Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:

Doesn't matter the metric, winner is still a single entity.

You see a race in the olympic, the one that finished first the 100m is the winner even if the 3rd place have made more money through sponsorship.

So yes Wii sold more on its gen, the reason a big portion don't consider it a winner is because they weren't competing with PS3 and X360 by admission of Nintendo and Sony themselves.

The flaw with your olympic analogy is Wii was first in sales and made the biggest profit.

Pretty sure PS3 lost money for Sony and 360 had the RROD problems.

Wii wasnt a direct competitor per se, but it certainly took potential sales from 360 and PS3. Especially in the casual market which was pretty significant at the time.

Isn't flawed.

Would be like saying Sony/MS were competing on the 100m and Wii on the 400m. Wii winning and making the best mark ever on their event doesn't affect the fact of the dispute of Sony/MS.

But yes Wii was the most successful among the consoles and DS the most successful HW of the gen.

Mr Puggsly said:
EricHiggin said:

Having the most powerful specs is not synonymous with only graphics matter.

Its notable when you consider Playstation and Xbox will share most of the same library though. There will be boasting about which platforms play the same game best.

Sony fans loved those debates before X1X. Then suddenly specs didnt really matter anymore.

If the graphics isn't better the most powerful specs would be useless.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

goopy20 said:
Azzanation said:

Different strategies, simular results in the end.

So when games like God of War were made, it wasnt held back by PS4 hardware when RTX-2080 GPUs were on the market? God of War still turned out pretty and so did Gears 5, lets also add TLOU2. It doesn't seem like older limited hardware is affecting the bigger AAA game developments and companie's vision.

A good developer will create a good game regardless of console limitations and BOTW is a perfect example of that.

Games can always look better regardless if they choose to use the latest console.

That doesn't even make sense. God of War and TLOU2 were build from the ground up around the limitations of the ps4. If those games would also have been released on ps3, they would have been far less spectacular.

I mean, lets say Valve decided to release Half Life 3, and it would be completely optimized and only run on a RTX 2080 with SSD, just imagine what that would look like. Unfortunately, there are not many AAA developers left that make games that really push the latest pc hardware, instead pc gamers get the same experience as on consoles and all the extra horsepower goes to waste by simply raising the fps, resolution and some graphical setting that don't really add anything to the games. It will be the exact same thing with all of the exclusives on the Xbox SeriesX, while Sony will drop a couple of 1st party bombs that will probably make Halo Infinite look like a last gen game.   

On PS3 they would have been far less spectacular. On PS4 they would have been the same games since they were built around the limitations of PS4. We saw plenty of games this gen that were cross gen but the last gen versions were heavily neutered in ways other than graphics. Battlefield had lower player counts and modes missing. CoD had no SP. We see in sports titles they only get "legacy updates" which means nothing changes outside of rosters. Shadow of Mordor launched on last gen consoles without the Nemesis system. Titanfall had less of the Azure controlled grunts running around, even Microsoft's own Horizon 2 was essentially a different game on 360 than the Xbone version.

It's way too early to tell anything about this or get bent out of shape about it at all. The next one or two years of MGS games will be cross gen, which means it could literally just be 2020 games. And even if it spills into 2021, they could be games built for next gen in mind and then scaled afterwards to make an Xbone version possible. I mean look at what MS is doing with Flight Simulator. There is a console version planned, but they aren't gimping the PC version for the sake of Xbone. The version we get on console will just not be as advanced.

Now if we get into a later time frame than that and Microsoft is still releasing cross gen games and even the XSX versions don't have any significant advantages outside of graphics, then we'll have real issues and something worth grabbing pitchforks over.



Xbox one Series:
Best consoles services - Xbox live, Gamepass, Xcloud.
Best place to play 3rd party games.
Proven backward compatible service and forward compatible.
Most powerful next gen console.
More games... combine all the recent studios acquisition with Gamepass.
Xbox Series X enhanced .... Microsoft set the bar with Xbox one X on what is to be expect with hardware enhance backward compatible.
Best value ..... Combine forward compatible with Xbox game pass it is a no brainer that Xbox will offer the best deal in console gaming.

Non Xbox brand supporter main unproven criticism (Cross-gen support) about games being held back is actually one of Microsoft strength going to next gen. It's a consumer friendly move, Microsoft is supporting every Xbox system owner regardless of which consoles they own, doesn't alienate people that haven't made the upgrade to next gen, your given a 1-2 year windows to upgrade on your own time table.

Microsoft biggest concern going forward will be the unproven quality of all the studios recently acquired but the sheer volume of game currently under development that is less of concern. Microsoft address the gap of RPG games and open world game with recent acquisition and creating the initiative. Regardless of what the competition does next gen there even more reason now to consider playing on the Xbox eco system where ever it's more convenient for you to do so.

I love that now the concern is XBox Series X games are going to be held back, when the narrative used to be Xbox as no games and you only get Halo and Gears. If Microsoft delivers a number of amazing quality games that are slightly held back graphically, I would be a very happy man.

Last edited by yvanjean - on 15 January 2020

yvanjean said:

Xbox one Series:
Best consoles services - Xbox live, Gamepass, Xcloud.
Best place to play 3rd party games.
Proven backward compatible service and forward compatible.
Most powerful next gen console.
More games... combine all the recent studios acquisition with Gamepass.
Xbox Series X enhanced .... Microsoft set the bar with Xbox one X on what is to be expect with hardware enhance backward compatible.
Best value ..... Combine forward compatible with Xbox game pass it is a no brainer that Xbox will offer the best deal in console gaming.

Non Xbox brand supporter main unproven criticism about games being held back is actually one of Microsoft strength going to next gen. It's a consumer friendly move, Microsoft is supporting every Xbox system owner regardless of which consoles they own, doesn't alienate people that haven't made the upgrade to next gen, your given a 1-2 year windows to upgrade on your own time table.

Microsoft biggest concern going forward will be the unproven quality of all the studios recently acquired but the sheer volume of game currently under development that is less of concern. Microsoft address the gap of RPG games and open world game with recent acquisition and creating the initiative. Regardless of what the competition does next gen there even more reason now to consider playing on the Xbox eco system where ever it's more convenient for you to do so.

I love that now the concern is XBox Series X games are going to be held back, when the narrative used to be Xbox as no games and you only get Halo and Gears. If Microsoft delivers a number of amazing quality games that are slightly held back graphically, I would be a very happy man.


Teh Chartz in a nutshell. A popular argument that used to be had here was how Sony supported their consoles for a decade+ and MS was the opposite supposedly abandoning customers the prior two gens and now we have MS continuing to support OG Xbone customers so you'd think it would be a positive thing but nah, what a shock, it's pure shit. Same as BC, instead of being seen as a good pro-consumer move it's nah, waste of money, distraction for poor sales, pure fan service and no big deal.



Around the Network
LudicrousSpeed said:

Teh Chartz in a nutshell. A popular argument that used to be had here was how Sony supported their consoles for a decade+ and MS was the opposite supposedly abandoning customers the prior two gens and now we have MS continuing to support OG Xbone customers so you'd think it would be a positive thing but nah, what a shock, it's pure shit. Same as BC, instead of being seen as a good pro-consumer move it's nah, waste of money, distraction for poor sales, pure fan service and no big deal.

Well it was true at the time with Xbox one, BC and gamepass were added in a time where Microsoft investment in studios wasn't the greatest. They use to make fun of gamepass because all you got were old Halo games and Crackdown 3.

Microsoft tried funding 3rd party studios to make exclusives but we all know how a waste of money that was and we got major cancelled like Fables Legend and Scalebound at the top of the list. Now Microsoft flip the table and on them, they improved and dealt with all of their past failures.

Microsoft services as surpass the competition by far and it's not something they will easily admit.

Xbox one X Enhanced backward compatible is something that need to become standard in the industry.

Edit: Just look at Nintendo still porting WiiU game to the Switch at almost full retail price. The PS5 is probably going to try to pawn full retail PS4 Enhanced & Remastered game on their customers. 

 
Gamepass was suppose to be a service were game get added and removed... But seem like no one reminded Microsoft that they are supposed to remove games. The services just keep on adding games. Even Microsoft forgot to update their main gamepass page they still have this statement on their website "Immerse yourself in a deep library of more than 100 high-quality console and PC games. Join the fun in new games or catch up on a recent hit. With Xbox Game Pass, you always have something new to play." 

But, There over 250 games on gamepass and ...

Confirmed games coming to Xbox Game Pass in future

Here are all known future Xbox Game Pass releases.

First-party Xbox Game Pass games:

  • Ori and the Will of the Wisp (February 11, 2020)
  • Minecraft Dungeons (2020)
  • Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
  • Psychonauts 2 (2020)
  • Halo Infinite (2020)
  • Bleeding Edge (2020)
  • Battletoads (TBA)
  • Grounded
  • Tell Me Why
  • Wasteland 3 (2020)

Third-party Xbox Game Pass games without a release date:

  • Blazing Chrome (TBA)
  • CrossCode (TBA)
  • Dead Static Drive (TBA)
  • Ikenfell (TBA)
  • Killer Queen Black (TBA)
  • Lord of the Rings (TBA)
  • Night Call (TBA)
  • Phoenix Point (TBA)
  • Riverbond (TBA)
  • Secret Neighbor (TBA)
  • Spiritfarer (TBA)
  • Spirit Renegades (TBA)
  • Supermarket Shriek (TBA)
  • The Good Life (TBA)
  • Totally Accurate Battle Simulator (TBA)
  • Totem Teller (TBA)
  • UnderMine (TBA)
  • Unto the End (TBA)
  • Way to the Woods (TBA)
  • Carrion
  • Cris Tales
  • Cyber Shadow
  • Darksiders III
  • Double Kick Heroes
  • Drake Hollow
  • Edge of Eternity
  • Final Fantasy VII
  • Final Fantasy VIII Remastered
  • Final Fantasy IX
  • Final Fantasy X: HD Remastered
  • Final Fantasy XII: The Zodiac Age
  • Final Fantasy XIII
  • Final Fantasy XIII-2
  • Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII
  • Final Fantasy XV
  • Forager
  • Haven
  • It Lurks Below
  • Levelhead
  • Life Is Strange 2: Episodes 4 and 5
  • My Friend Pedro
  • PHOGS
  • She Dreams Elsewhere
  • SkateBird
  • Streets of Rage 4
  • Scourge Bringer
  • Supraland
  • Tekken 7
  • Touhou Luna Nights
  • The Escapists 2
  • The Red Lantern
  • The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
  • Vambrace: Cold Soul
  • West of Dead
  • Yazuka 0
  • Yazuka Kiwami
  • Yazuka Kiwami 2



https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2019-04-30-xbox-game-pass-games-list-price-6010

Last edited by yvanjean - on 15 January 2020

DonFerrari said:
Mr Puggsly said:

The flaw with your olympic analogy is Wii was first in sales and made the biggest profit.

Pretty sure PS3 lost money for Sony and 360 had the RROD problems.

Wii wasnt a direct competitor per se, but it certainly took potential sales from 360 and PS3. Especially in the casual market which was pretty significant at the time.

Isn't flawed.

Would be like saying Sony/MS were competing on the 100m and Wii on the 400m. Wii winning and making the best mark ever on their event doesn't affect the fact of the dispute of Sony/MS.

But yes Wii was the most successful among the consoles and DS the most successful HW of the gen.

Mr Puggsly said:

Having the most powerful specs is not synonymous with only graphics matter.

Its notable when you consider Playstation and Xbox will share most of the same library though. There will be boasting about which platforms play the same game best.

Sony fans loved those debates before X1X. Then suddenly specs didnt really matter anymore.

If the graphics isn't better the most powerful specs would be useless.

Again, analogy was bad given Wii had success in sales and profit. Your analogy was one sold better but another made more money. Just read what you said.

I consider resolution and performance as an element of graphics. So if Series X has the rumored 12TF, it will certainly help many games achieve 60 fps, while raising the bar in visuals and maintain a high resolution.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

LudicrousSpeed said:
goopy20 said:

That doesn't even make sense. God of War and TLOU2 were build from the ground up around the limitations of the ps4. If those games would also have been released on ps3, they would have been far less spectacular.

I mean, lets say Valve decided to release Half Life 3, and it would be completely optimized and only run on a RTX 2080 with SSD, just imagine what that would look like. Unfortunately, there are not many AAA developers left that make games that really push the latest pc hardware, instead pc gamers get the same experience as on consoles and all the extra horsepower goes to waste by simply raising the fps, resolution and some graphical setting that don't really add anything to the games. It will be the exact same thing with all of the exclusives on the Xbox SeriesX, while Sony will drop a couple of 1st party bombs that will probably make Halo Infinite look like a last gen game.   

On PS3 they would have been far less spectacular. On PS4 they would have been the same games since they were built around the limitations of PS4. We saw plenty of games this gen that were cross gen but the last gen versions were heavily neutered in ways other than graphics. Battlefield had lower player counts and modes missing. CoD had no SP. We see in sports titles they only get "legacy updates" which means nothing changes outside of rosters. Shadow of Mordor launched on last gen consoles without the Nemesis system. Titanfall had less of the Azure controlled grunts running around, even Microsoft's own Horizon 2 was essentially a different game on 360 than the Xbone version.

It's way too early to tell anything about this or get bent out of shape about it at all. The next one or two years of MGS games will be cross gen, which means it could literally just be 2020 games. And even if it spills into 2021, they could be games built for next gen in mind and then scaled afterwards to make an Xbone version possible. I mean look at what MS is doing with Flight Simulator. There is a console version planned, but they aren't gimping the PC version for the sake of Xbone. The version we get on console will just not be as advanced.

Now if we get into a later time frame than that and Microsoft is still releasing cross gen games and even the XSX versions don't have any significant advantages outside of graphics, then we'll have real issues and something worth grabbing pitchforks over.

Well maybe you're right. After all they did manage to port Cyberpunk to the ps1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k1MdFCy4hc



DonFerrari said:
eva01beserk said:

But power was never Nintendo's promo. But Xbox had been power since the xbox x.

Actually power was always the thing of Xbox.

Original Xbox was the most powerful on the gen, X360 is close to PS3 in power and coming one year early that meant they were trying to be the most powerful again, X1 Don said it was impossible that they would ever let PS4 be 30% more powerful (and he was lying through and through since the systems were already revealed and the power difference was know), X1X was launched a year after PS4Pro to ensure they would be a lot more powerful, they are also touting the power of XSX (which leakers said are very near PS5 in power but haven't said which is stronger and other leakers say it is 30% stronger).

Maybe. But if I remember correctly they never made such forcefull advertisement of power since xbox one x. It's like every time xbox gets mentioned they have to add "most powerful console". They have nothing else so it makes sense thats what they flaunt.



It takes genuine talent to see greatness in yourself despite your absence of genuine talent.

Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:

Isn't flawed.

Would be like saying Sony/MS were competing on the 100m and Wii on the 400m. Wii winning and making the best mark ever on their event doesn't affect the fact of the dispute of Sony/MS.

But yes Wii was the most successful among the consoles and DS the most successful HW of the gen.

If the graphics isn't better the most powerful specs would be useless.

Again, analogy was bad given Wii had success in sales and profit. Your analogy was one sold better but another made more money. Just read what you said.

I consider resolution and performance as an element of graphics. So if Series X has the rumored 12TF, it will certainly help many games achieve 60 fps, while raising the bar in visuals and maintain a high resolution.

You understood it wrong then. I wasn't making an analogy to Wii in that. I was saying that on the olympic event the winner is whoever finished first even if the third had made more money. Because the question was that there can be more than one winner depending on the metric.

Then I explained why Wii winning didn't impacted the competition between PS/MS since in that gen Wii wasn't really competing with both.

If PS5 is 9Tf and XSX is 12TF then it should have better graphics across the board (that is why I was confused when you were seemingly implying that better HW doesn't mean better graphics), with the fold on if PS5 games look better than XSX (let's say because of crossgame, don't think it would happen with 30% power difference, but for guess sake let's pretend) then the specs advantage of XSX would be meaningless (as was on discussions of X360 vs PS3 that for most of the gen the ports for X360 looked better so PS3 being slightly more powerful was meaningless for most customers).

eva01beserk said:
DonFerrari said:

Actually power was always the thing of Xbox.

Original Xbox was the most powerful on the gen, X360 is close to PS3 in power and coming one year early that meant they were trying to be the most powerful again, X1 Don said it was impossible that they would ever let PS4 be 30% more powerful (and he was lying through and through since the systems were already revealed and the power difference was know), X1X was launched a year after PS4Pro to ensure they would be a lot more powerful, they are also touting the power of XSX (which leakers said are very near PS5 in power but haven't said which is stronger and other leakers say it is 30% stronger).

Maybe. But if I remember correctly they never made such forcefull advertisement of power since xbox one x. It's like every time xbox gets mentioned they have to add "most powerful console". They have nothing else so it makes sense thats what they flaunt.

I see, well that I can't confront because Xbox original and even launch X360 I didn't see any marketing in Brazil. X1 I saw the comments from Don but really don't remember seeing they saying it was more powerful in marketing, perhaps they used the standard "better than last gen, improvement, etc".

But yes X1X they were pretty clear on marketing for the most powerful console ever.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."