If you the OP of this thread didn't bother to read the whole article to gather information that would make you more knowlagable about the DLC being offered

Then what makes you think that anyone else in thread is going to.

It all boils down to you not wanting to look at the evidence that disproves your rumor because you want to continue to belive that the cake is not a lie.

Above is the image of the scan. Pwnd.

Ah of course. And now we discover how you spun the truth.

-"Rockstar isn't revealing any details at this time"
-"Microsoft's assurances that they will add AT LEAST 10 hours gameplay"
-"Rockstar is HINTING that they'll be seperate storylines"

Exactly how is what is written here stronger than the more recent and impartial rumours from CVG?

-The magazine stated “GTA IV is set to completely redefine the idea with expansions that are to GTA IV what Vice City or San Andreas were to GTA III. Yes, Rockstar is CLEARLY HINTING at new downloadable cities.”

Lol.  I feel so sorry for people when they do this to themselves.  Read the page you linked to again.  Read it very carefully.

Realize that it helps MY case not YOUR case.

Leave the thread quietly and we'll forget you ever embarrassed yourself like this. 

How did I spin the truth. I stated that the DLC would be 10 hours long and that they would be storylines not cities. That is exactly what that scan says.

You sir, are the spinning the truth even while it stares everyone else in the face.

 Wait... what? 

Further proof fanboi's of any sort cannot be reasoned with.

Actually what it says is "at LEAST 10 hours long."

It then goes on to say that the DLC will be storylines "within the game."  It did NOT say "the DLC will be storylines found withing the Liberty City that ships on the game disk."  It did NOT say "only 10 hours long."  You sir, either lied or got terribly confused.

Exactly how is this an example of fanboys being oblivious to the "undisputable truth" as you put it?  I find it particularly interesting that your source used exactly the same words as mine when they said that "Rockstar is HINTING" at something.  Of course, I didn't feel the need to lie about the rest of my source............. 

I think the dlc we see this Autumn will be mission packs.

But i doubt we will see a new city, i think that's something R* would like to do eventually but R* and Microsoft have said the content will offer 10 hours of additional content, which just doesn't add up to it being a new city.

Perhaps at a later date but not the DLC the 360 will see this Autumn.

So I'm predicting a fairly beefed up mission pack.

 it's not clearly hinting anything other than what was stated , your interpriting it to mean that , it could be Taxi missions with a mediocore story line.

Indeed, it is not even hinting at what was stated.  It hints at very little.  It could well be a taxi mission with a mediocre storyline. But where I have positioned my argument as rumour-based (in the thread title no less), he called his "undisputable fact" that only a fanboy would oppose.

However, given the size of the cash advance Microsoft gave Take Two, and TT's potential for profit off DLC, I'd say we can expect substantial, wide-ranging and high-quality DLC. 

 You proved my point completely about your style of faulty interprutation. You keep looking at what the article DOESN'T SAY instead of what it actually does report.

That style of interpetation has started nany rumors that never pan out. Hell ther's so much spin and half truths in that statement I bet the Bush adminstration will be after your resume tomorrow