By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Rumour: GTAIV DLC on Xbox 360 will include new city!!!!!! OMFG!!!!

dsoverpsp said:
Riot Of The Blood said:
Is this a big deal or something? I'm still buying the PS3 version. DLC cost extra money. That stuff should already be in the game. Holding out and making us pay for stuff that should have been in the game right off tops is bullshit.

then what about dl maps for Halo3?

IF the expansions are anywhere near the size of SA and VC then we are saving money compared to last generation, as Rockstar would have charged $60 for the games if they were on discs.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network
starcraft said:
SleepWaking said:
sailordude said:
how can you honestly even say "there is going to be another city!"? ok, it took them years to make the city thats in GTA IV so that makes no sence since they are going to start the next game. i bet it will just be a few extra missions or multiplayer moders or something. but like people have said, who ever gets close to beating GTA so why would you want more and also you know it will cost at least a quarter of the game if your lucky.

Why are you here if you do not care about DLC? And he isn't saying there wil be another city, he just copied a rumor and want to discuss if thi ispossible and what it would mean, like what is done with all the other rumors being discussed on forums. PLS if you don't know how forums work get the hell out of here!!


Again, thankyou for bring some semblence of sanity to the forums.

I have brought more snaity and reasonable arguments in the form of facts from reliable internet scources and print mags to this thread than anyone else yet everyone with a hard on for DLC has completely ignored or skimed over them. So to recap I'll relist all the links that disprove the rumor of massive city DLC. 

Proves episodic content and multiplayer modes not huge VC size cities:

 
http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/863/863450p9.html

Shows how the 50 million exchanged was not a payment but an advance that must be paid back.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=700735

.
http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=6023&Itemid=2

 Shows that DLC content will only be around 10 hours worth

 http://xbox360.qj.net/OXM-gives-GTA-4-10-10-score-Xbox-360-DLC-10-hours-long/pg/49/aid/118166

 

How many times do fanboi's in here need to be browbeat with indisputible proof before they get pwnd and STHU.

 



rasone77 said:
starcraft said:
 

Again, thankyou for bring some semblence of sanity to the forums.

I have brought more snaity and reasonable arguments in the form of facts from reliable internet scources and print mags to this thread than anyone else yet everyone with a hard on for DLC has completely ignored or skimed over them. So to recap I'll relist all the links that disprove the rumor of massive city DLC.

Proves episodic content and multiplayer modes not huge VC size cities:


http://au.ps3.ign.com/articles/863/863450p9.html

Shows how the 50 million exchanged was not a payment but an advance that must be paid back.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=700735

Shows that DLC content will only be around 10 hours worth

http://xbox360.qj.net/OXM-gives-GTA-4-10-10-score-Xbox-360-DLC-10-hours-long/pg/49/aid/118166

 

How many times do fanboi's in here need to be browbeat with indisputible proof before they get pwnd and STHU.

 

All the first link said was that the DLC will be well worth the money. It did NOT say what the DLC would be. And why would it, the interview was conducted by IGN's PS3 division.

Everyone reasonable in this thread has acknowledged that the payment was an advance. But those reasonable people (and in this case, you are not included) have also pointed out that the $50 million dollar cash advance came at a time when Take Two desperately needed it and it is therefore likely Microsoft leveraged something very special from them. Also, if the DLC is excellent and sells well, Take Two gets to keep any revenue above and beyond $50 million, providing an incentive to make large, successful DLC.

As for the third link? The link within a link proved do be a dog, mentioning nothing about the length of the DLC. Even if it had, ten hours of extra core gameplay (and god knows how much collectibles/screwing around gameplay) would almost certainly mean the addition of extra physical areas to the game.

You sir, have been pwnd.

Now STHU!!!!

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

"Rumour"

lawl.

I love the aussie U. It's put in words that don't even need it.

Colour, Favourite, etc. It's so awesome.

Sorry for going so off topic, but this topic is done to death anyway.



DMeisterJ said:
"Rumour"

lawl.

I love the aussie U. It's put in words that don't even need it.

Colour, Favourite, etc. It's so awesome.

Sorry for going so off topic, but this topic is done to death anyway.

Actually, proper English has the 'u' in those words (its also in labour).  You Americans just stole the language from England.

I once said that to an American and he said "There are 550 million English speakers in the world, and 300 million of them are American.  GET YOUR OWN FUCKING LANGUAGE!!!"

He was a funny guy  

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network

So is flavor, "flavour", savor, "savour", etc.

If so, that'd be awesome.



Yep. In fact, I didn't even realise that you American's misspell savour



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Actually the third link was supposed to go here where you can read the Actual scaned images from OXM.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=23734

Also how can Offical X-box Magazine be a dog concerning the DLC anyway. Or is M$ just a bunch of liars.... oh wait.... uh damn....

See what I did there.



rasone77 said:

Actually the third link was supposed to go here where you can read the Actual scaned images from OXM.

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=23734

Also how can Offical X-box Magazine be a dog concerning the DLC anyway. Or is M$ just a bunch of liars.... oh wait.... uh damn....

See what I did there.


I'm not reading the whole magazine, but given noone in the thread of people that did read it even mentioned DLC im going to go right ahead and assume that your wrong.

Now I'm going to explain something too you.  Being the official Xbox 360 magazine does NOT make them a Microsoft mouthpiece.  It makes them the only endorsed magazine, which you'll find does not equate to that many exclusives and does not prevent them from printing rumour and speculation if you go over their history.

When Microsoft wants to say something, it uses an executive, PR rep, or press release.

See what you failed at there? 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS