An Xperia + ps4 can be bought for 400€ the price of a ps4 Pro. Really not much. And with mobile data on your phone you can play it anywhere. 

Even on the plane? Many planes don't allow you to use table/smartphone with wifi/3G.

I'll add the fact that mobile data means that you're paying to play on the go as well, so in order to use the set up he's bringing up you need to buy 2 separate devices one of which that has you paying an ongoing contract.

I understand why you pointed out that many of the games are also on Switch. But not why you didn't mention that most of the games on the Switch list were also on PS4.
If your response was because you thought he portrayed the gap as more wide than it really was, why did you make a comment that demonstrated a gap that is more narrow than your comment would suggest? Because that would just prompt someone to inform you of the same thing.

The difference is he kept things consistent on both sides, while you only excluded multiplatform titles from PS4's side of the list.

Also, I would challenge your idea that a multiplatform inclusive list makes the gap look more wide than if the lists were only comprised of exclusives.
I'm pretty sure it's the other way around.

An Xperia + ps4 can be bought for 400€ the price of a ps4 Pro. Really not much. And with mobile data on your phone you can play it anywhere. 

That's if you can even get a signal, a lot of places where I live have terrible connections, like it can be a pain ass to watch youtube a lot of the time due to getting low bars because I am in some spotty place. Hell back when I actually used my Vita, remote play never worked for me outside of my house when I tried to play outside of my house and 2 years ago during a road trip I tried to play Witcher 3 on Vita connect to phone's mobile and it just kick me off instantly. Now I don't know where you live, but streaming game's especially in the US will never be suitable substitute to playing something locally for a long time due some of the sheer hops you have to go through just get it to work.

You're still avoiding answering my question though.
If you find yourself in a situation where you have to avoid answering a simple question multiple times, then you probably shouldn't be surprised if your post gets attention.

I won't ask for a third time, because I'm sure you have no intention of answering at this point. Which ironically tells me what I wanted to know.
I will say though that if you call someone out for unfairly portraying the a gap between two parties in favor of one, the answer is not to do the same for the other.

I'm curious what your thought process was here?

I informed him that many games on the PS4 list are or will soon be on the Switch list, demonstrating the gap is not as wide as the long list would suggest.

Yes its getting a few JRPG/S-rpgs but its still got along way to go compaired to the PS4:

I understand why you pointed out that many of the games are also on Switch. But not why you didn't mention that most of the games on the Switch list were also on PS4.
If your response was because you thought he portrayed the gap as more wide than it really was, why did you make a comment that demonstrated a gap that is more narrow than your comment would suggest?

Yes its getting a few JRPG/S-rpgs but its still got along way to go compaired to the PS4:

I was reacting only to JRPGfan's post, not the thread in general.

I won't ask for a third time, because I'm sure you have no intention of answering at this point.

You're still avoiding answering my question though.
If you find yourself in a situation where you have to avoid answering a simple question multiple times, then you probably shouldn't be surprised if your post gets attention.

I won't ask for a third time, because I'm sure you have no intention of answering at this point. Which ironically tells me what I wanted to know.
I will say though that if you call someone out for unfairly portraying the a gap between two parties in favor of one, the answer is not to do the same for the other.