By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Finally got around to beating Horizon

LudicrousSpeed on 13 September 2018
contestgamer said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

Shirley you’re joking.

No, I wont play anything under 80. Why waste my time on mediocrity? 

There are lots of great games under 80 though.

 

Mummelmann said:
Great game, but the combat is way too easy, even on the hardest difficulties. Still haven't gotten the expansion, I hear it's much harder though.

Glad to hear it wasn’t just me that found the combat stupid easy.



Around the Network
contestgamer on 13 September 2018
LudicrousSpeed said:
contestgamer said:

No, I wont play anything under 80. Why waste my time on mediocrity? 

There are lots of great games under 80 though.

 

Mummelmann said:
Great game, but the combat is way too easy, even on the hardest difficulties. Still haven't gotten the expansion, I hear it's much harder though.

Glad to hear it wasn’t just me that found the combat stupid easy.

Name 3.



LudicrousSpeed on 13 September 2018
contestgamer said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

There are lots of great games under 80 though.

 

Glad to hear it wasn’t just me that found the combat stupid easy.

Name 3.

Prey, Wolfenstein, Until Dawn, Alien Isolation and Hans of Fate are all really good SP games and got 79’s. You’re saying that because it scored 1 point below your bar, you won’t play them? Oh well, your loss.



DonFerrari on 14 September 2018
LudicrousSpeed said:
contestgamer said:

Maybe for you but I wouldnt touch a 7/10 game if I was paid $30 to play it.

Shirley you’re joking.

He said in multiple threads he won't play a game bellow 85 if I'm not wrong. But in this case it's personal evaluation, so if he think the game deserves 7/10 them he won't touch it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari on 14 September 2018
LudicrousSpeed said:
contestgamer said:

Name 3.

Prey, Wolfenstein, Until Dawn, Alien Isolation and Hans of Fate are all really good SP games and got 79’s. You’re saying that because it scored 1 point below your bar, you won’t play them? Oh well, your loss.

Haven't played Prey, Wolfenstein and Hans of Fate... but certainly would give 80 or more for Until Dawn and Alien Isolation, quite good games.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
method114 on 14 September 2018
contestgamer said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

Shirley you’re joking.

No, I wont play anything under 80. Why waste my time on mediocrity? 

I'm not shocked that you wont play anything under 80 because some people just have a limited amount of money and or time to play. What I'm shocked about is that you actually trust reviewers. I can't think of any reviewer I trust enough to implement a system like that. On top of that moneytime I have plenty of so I could care less if I waste $60 and 3-4 hours on a bad game.



contestgamer on 14 September 2018
LudicrousSpeed said:
contestgamer said:

Name 3.

Prey, Wolfenstein, Until Dawn, Alien Isolation and Hans of Fate are all really good SP games and got 79’s. You’re saying that because it scored 1 point below your bar, you won’t play them? Oh well, your loss.

Well I did play both Prey and Alien Isolation, and enjoyed the latter, less the former, but both of those got 80+ on PC so I cant really count those.

 

method114 said:
contestgamer said:

No, I wont play anything under 80. Why waste my time on mediocrity? 

I'm not shocked that you wont play anything under 80 because some people just have a limited amount of money and or time to play. What I'm shocked about is that you actually trust reviewers. I can't think of any reviewer I trust enough to implement a system like that. On top of that moneytime I have plenty of so I could care less if I waste $60 and 3-4 hours on a bad game.

Its an issue of time and the fact that there are so many 85+ games released each year. As it is already I have a ridiculous backlog of 85+ games I havent had time to play. Usually I wont miss 90+ games, because there's fewer of them.



LudicrousSpeed on 15 September 2018

Got the plat yesterday.

FW already has better characters than the generic and forgettable people from the main game. The Deathclaw looking enemy that stands up is pretty cool. I discovered the greatness of the slingshot yesterday. It makes combat even easier but it’s fun to launch bombs or stickies at enemies and blow bits and pieces off.