I must be the only one who isn't bothered by games getting delayed, my backlog is so huge it just doesn't affect me.

Besides, 7 years of waiting for The Last Guardian kinda made me immune to this.

Still going to be there day 1 in Undead Burg to show new people to the series what's it like to get invaded :)

Sarcasm, but its more trolling.

It sucks for Switch-only gamers. I would probably pick the PS4 version anyway, because it's cheaper, but man, what's with all the Switch delays? It feels like Wii U all over again, not even Nintendo itself is capable of releasing games, not a single great Nintendo Switch game released so far in 2018. I still have faith, because of Pokémon and Smash, but is it always going to be like this? Only 2 or 3 great games release by year and months of waiting?

Honestly, the comment does not add anything constructive, even more now that many of us are mad and dissapointed.

But oh well, my hope is that the dev improves the game and we get maybe new costumes.

A botw Link costume would be nice.

Maybe I need to harass devs until I get it.

I love it. The only replies i've gotten thus far have been literally ignoring what i've written in this thread. It's amazing. You guys going to ignore the huge ass constructive comment I wrote in this thread? Because you can't stand a joke? By the way, it wasn't "trolling", it was making a joke out of a truth. But I guess those aren't allowed anymore. If a joke isn't to your taste that's fine. But don't say I'm not being constructive when I actually put some dedication into a previous comment. 

If you are allowed to say a joke, I'm also allowed to say whatever I want.

Link me to the part where I said you weren't allowed to. Also explain to me why calling out some plain falsities deserves this kind of reply. 

You edited your comment. Would be nice to not do it.

Edit: Btw, to answer your question it is said I'm not allowed to comment in the same part where you were implying jokes were not allowed. We only where trying to find what was the purpose of the comment. If you felt the need to respond, must because our perception may hold some true.

And finally, nobody said your other comments weren't constructive. I quoted only one comment, not an entire person.

What? Are you seriously accusing me of editing something out? 

I edited THIS INTO my comment: "If a joke isn't to your taste that's fine. But don't say I'm not being constructive when I actually put some dedication into a previous comment. "

I understand that you can not see the original comment, but please do not just flat out assume I am editing comments to weasel out of something. I never said in my comment you weren't allowed to say something. You are more than allowed. I was just correcting you, which I think is pretty fair. 

What? So if I respond it must be because your perception is truth? Then why did you originally reply to me at all trying to find out the truth? Then I would have automatically been corresponding with your initial analysis just by responding? 

I never said that you were not allowed to comment, didn't even imply it. You must have interpreted that somehow. 

And finally, the joke was constructive. Believe it or not, jokes can hold truths. I know we like to amount everything we disagree on the internet with trolling (responding to Miyamotoo, not you) but it is not always such. 

And sure you were responding to one post, but if someone goes on to give a detailed constructive comment later in the thread ... what is the point of taking another comment and saying it is unconstructive?