By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Xenoblade Chronicles 2 - Official Game Trailer - Nintendo E3 2017

IkePoR on 14 June 2017
TheLastStarFighter said:
Why is there something wrong with a character having big boobs? My wife's a G-cup. Is there something wrong with her? Why can't a female lead have big boobs?

If your wife's G-cup fits her body type, I'm sure she looks perfectly normal.  If she's 110 lbs, she might get a few stares.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

Around the Network
dahuman on 14 June 2017

For people that think this game is ugly, it's not



KLAMarine on 14 June 2017
IkePoR said:
RolStoppable said:

In the box art her wing covers the view on her butt. Pyra doesn't even show cleavage in all other instances. Did we see any breast-bouncing yet?

My mistake, it's not the boxart.  It's whatever this is.

Never mentioned anything about booby bouncing.  I'm surprised it's not here - yet.   But it's irrelevant.  Character design doesn't happen by accident, there's no "genetics" to a character in a game.  I just think it's kind of sad that female heroines are being sold as bottomless bimbos in 2017.  While the world is thematic and in line with the rest of the series, the design of the characters is all over the place.  The two main characters look completely unfitting next to the other characters shown.  Shulk has a ridiculous outfit, but so does the majority of the rest of the cast of Xenoblade.  

Judge Pyra not by the sight of her skin but by the content of her character.



Naum on 14 June 2017

I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

bigtakilla on 14 June 2017
Anfebious said:
bigtakilla said:

Because it's retreading, and instead of offering more (or hell even the same) it's essentially offering less (no armor customization). When the greatest thing about it is it is basically on a slightly more powerful system (the whole its objectively better thing you were talking about which I mean c'mon we giving brownie points for that), and doesn't expand on the ideas of its predecesors, its kind of a letdown.

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 14 June 2017
Anfebious said:
bigtakilla said:

Because it's retreading, and instead of offering more (or hell even the same) it's essentially offering less (no armor customization). When the greatest thing about it is it is basically on a slightly more powerful system (the whole its objectively better thing you were talking about which I mean c'mon we giving brownie points for that), and doesn't expand on the ideas of its predecesors, its kind of a letdown.

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.



Naum on 14 June 2017

I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

bigtakilla on 14 June 2017
Naum said:
I feel sorry for those that only judge a game by its graphics wich I can clearly see in this thread.
Iet's your loss after all, if this game is even half as good as XB1 I'm will be one happy mother f**ker.

I have no doubt it'll be at least half as good. Shame they didn't go for more though.



bigtakilla on 14 June 2017
Volterra_90 said:
RolStoppable said:

All of that is only your opinion.

Everything that can be measured objectively seems to be better in XC2.

Agreed. We can't talk about plot as for now, but the individual areas seem bigger, the combat is refined and improved, the game looks better... I don't find, as for now, any single measurable reason why this can't be better than the first one. And not a single reason why this game doesn't deserve the Xenoblade name.

How exactly is combat refined and improved? The game looks better sure, but in that "Call Of Duty Ghosts" next gen kind of way (they even said in the Treehouse the engine and assets are taken directly from X).



Anfebious on 14 June 2017
bigtakilla said:
Anfebious said:

I think the issue you have with this game is that it isn't a XCX sequel. It's a sequel to the first game it's expanding on that game. Personally I feel extremely relieved because XCX was lame.

I loved both games, so not sure why that would be an issue. Though you are missing entirely what was stated above about how it is missing things even the first game provided to its players, not really sure how it's "expanding on the first game" either? At least not to the same degree XCX did.

I don't see what's missing from the first game. 

It's expanding an already perfect formula. Bigger enviroments and a few tweaks on the battle system.

 



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"