Quantcast
Predict Arms' Metascore

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Predict Arms' Metascore

Goodnightmoon said:
Azuren said:

Yeah, not even going to read your post, because there's no way in hell a conversation about the possibility of a new Nintendo IP not getting 90+ with you is going to go anywhere. 

Who the fuck has said the game is gonna be a 90 when I predicted a 83? You are irrational and annoying "not even going to read your post" But you have no problem throwing bullshit without even reading the content, great.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Around the Network
Azuren said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Who the fuck has said the game is gonna be a 90 when I predicted a 83? You are irrational and annoying "not even going to read your post" But you have no problem throwing bullshit without even reading the content, great.

Thanks for giving me the reason in front of everyone and for showing how immature you are.



Think it'll surprise.

85



YNWA

Goodnightmoon said:
Azuren said:

Thanks for giving me the reason in front of everyone and for showing how immature you are.

Right, because a public statement of "I'm not discussing this with you" is actually an invite to discuss it with you. In addition to that, I'm the immature one for continuing to not discuss it with you. Me, the one who made a rational decision to not bother discussing something, is the immature one, rather than the one who keeps hounding the other, trying to drag them into an argument and calling them immature when they refuse twice.

 

Oh wait. No.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Goodnightmoon said:
First number that comes to my head is 83
Azuren said:

Yeah, not even going to read your post, because there's no way in hell a conversation about the possibility of a new Nintendo IP not getting 90+ with you is going to go anywhere. 

 

"Rational"



Around the Network
Goodnightmoon said:
Goodnightmoon said:
First number that comes to my head is 83
Azuren said:

Yeah, not even going to read your post, because there's no way in hell a conversation about the possibility of a new Nintendo IP not getting 90+ with you is going to go anywhere. 

 

"Rational"

You jumped into a conversation about why it wouldn't get a 90+. You suddenly being a participant doesn't change what the conversation is about.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Azuren said:
Goodnightmoon said:

"Rational"

You jumped into a conversation about why it wouldn't get a 90+. You suddenly being a participant doesn't change what the conversation is about.

No, I jumped onto a conversation where you were saying ARMS is boring and any kind of success or critic praise would be only consequence of the company behind.



I think 78 sounds about right. The game just doesn't interest me at all.



Wii U NNID:  CWegzz
3DS Friend Code:  4210-5277-5484
PSN:  Ronnoc4
Steam:  CWegz

Goodnightmoon said:
Azuren said:

You jumped into a conversation about why it wouldn't get a 90+. You suddenly being a participant doesn't change what the conversation is about.

No, I jumped onto a conversation where you were saying ARMS is boring and any kind of success or critic praise would be only consequence of the company behind.

Nope. You jumped into a conversation where I was stating the only justification for a Metacritic of higher than 90 is due to reviewer fear of fan backlash.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Azuren said:
I predict most reviewers will be too scared to properly rate it, so it'll get a 90+.
Azuren said:

 if it gets over 90, then it did so on the basis that reviewers are scared to give a well-received Nintendo game anything but a 90% or higher.


Meanwhile in the real world


http://i.gyazo.com/8d14339f56d9a3b26bb9a483d69201f9.png