By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS Plus Free Games: April 2017

torok said:
Tmfwang said:

Eh, PSN is far more stable now than it used to be, hasn't been down for the last year for me

I don't know, I really didn't had that many issues with it when it was free. It gets eventual maintenances and one or another downtine per year, it's not bad. But ti's basically the same.

You can still play online during maintenances now



Predicted 15+ million lifetime-sales for God of War:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234612&page=1

Around the Network

They are not even trying at this point.



                                                                                     

Bristow9091 said:
I don't understand it, everywhere I go there's people complaining that Plus has been awful for ages now... is it because we don't always get AAA games? I'm fine with getting indie games, there's a ton of gems out there, you just have to broaden your scope.

As for this month, I'm really looking forward to Drawn To Death, if there's one thing David Jaffe knows, it's how to make a fun game! I've not actually heard of Lovers In Dangerous Spacetime until today, where on so many places there are people complaining that "XBOX already got this two months ago!". to which my response is: ...so what?

Well that should only concern people who pay for both Xbox Live and PS+.

But yeah that's what I read countless times even on VGC when a 360 GwG game was on PS+ years ago. So what.


But overall, c'mon you got to admit that the selection is crappy. Compared to GwG AND the first years of PS+. Far less people care about indies and they are usually cheaper to buy as well, so they add not much value. Even 3 years old AAA games attract more people. There's no reason Sony couldn't throw in some decent PS4 launch titles and some real AAA PS3 games.



I agree that this month isn't good, but Tearaway and LBP3 the last two months were bad? Really?



Ariakon said:

I agree that this month isn't good, but Tearaway and LBP3 the last two months were bad? Really?

Those months were awesome! 



Around the Network

Terrible stuff.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.

Guess i will try Drawn to Death but other than that... yawn...



Bristow9091 said:
Barozi said:

Well that should only concern people who pay for both Xbox Live and PS+.

But yeah that's what I read countless times even on VGC when a 360 GwG game was on PS+ years ago. So what.


But overall, c'mon you got to admit that the selection is crappy. Compared to GwG AND the first years of PS+. Far less people care about indies and they are usually cheaper to buy as well, so they add not much value. Even 3 years old AAA games attract more people. There's no reason Sony couldn't throw in some decent PS4 launch titles and some real AAA PS3 games.

That depends on the player, I enjoy finding new indie games to play, and the value is still very high for me... I pay £40 a year, which works out at less than £4 a month, for that, as an owner of a PS4, PS3 and PS Vita, I get a whole six games, which is usually anywhere between £50-£80 in total value per month, sometimes even higher too.

yep so why do you blame those who think it's not good value or that the games have been way better in the past?



Ka-pi96 said:
shikamaru317 said:

Another poor month. PS+ quality has been going downhill for awhile now.

Since the PS4 release really

Guess having `PS+ required for multiplayer means Sony don't need the games as an incentive for people to get it anymore so they just don't care as much.

Or maybe... maybe they want to actually sell some games.

 

I dont know what the problem is here. People always lament they want more gaemz. So more gaemz they get. Six gaemz for four bugs a month. That's a steal. But still not satisfied. O how unfortunate. 



Hunting Season is done...

shikamaru317 said:
naruball said:

Even a penny for every time I read this would be enough to make me rich by now. Laziness has nothing to do with it. Getting better games would simply cost them more money. Even calling them greedy would make more sense.

Fair point, lazy probably wasn't the best word to use there. Greedy makes more sense. They know that they don't need to compete against the quality of the titles on GWG because GWG isn't enough of a selling point to convince a significant number of people to buy XB1 instead of PS4, so they decided to save some money and buy indie tier stuff mostly. 

Yup. Seems like it.

Though Tearaway and Little Big Planet 3 were great games. Even if they're not everyone's cup of tea, people should at least admit that they were AA(A)/non indie games with good scores. For example, if they were to offer Killzone, I woulnd't play it but I would have given them props for giving a decent AAA game over the plethora of indies we've been getting.