Ruler said: To see how absurd the situation is, you need only look at the other material hosted on the Internet Archive. You won't be finding any Hollywood movies from the 1980s and 1990s in the film section of the site, only public domain curiosities. Die Hard, Jurassic Park and Pulp Fiction are not available to stream or download, because that would clearly be piracy and would make Internet Archive no better than a disreputable torrent site. Yet copyrighted games from the same period are, it seems, fair game. Does that make sense? It's this refusal to even acknowledge the issue that troubles me most, because sooner or later it will bite all of us in our 8-bit butts. I'm certainly not putting myself on a moral pedestal - I'm a retro gamer, I have used emulators and I continue to use emulators. It feels different when an individual does it, but I'm very aware that's really just a semantic dodge. As a community, this is something we all need to stop skirting around because, frankly, we're devaluing the very medium we profess to love. |
Doesn't even touch the core of the problem. The constant comparison with movies just shows that.
You know what the difference is? Movies are still being offered and monetized while games from that time aren't. They're basically dead media that the companies are sitting on doing nothing with it. You know what should happen to those things like all copyright material? It should expire.
Emulators and piracy are the only reason why most younger people even know some IPs. And you know what they do then? Trying to find new material of it. Consumers have shown time and time again that they're willing to pay if there is a fair and convenient offer. If Emulators were really that big of an issue then the NES classic would sell nothing.
I propose to you that the sales of the NES Classic would be only half if it wasn't for emulators.
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.