By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Hillary Clinton Goes Full Tin Foil Hat

Normchacho on 02 November 2016
Mr Puggsly said:
pokoko said:

It has nothing to do with her "defenders" and it shouldn't have anything to do with her "attackers".  I'm not voting for her.  What it has to do with is your opposition to a fundamental right of any American citizen.  It's beyond silly political bickering.  

You might want to check out the Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution.  I don't know where you're from but most US citizens take this seriously.

More of how I feel about her character than the system itself.

Again, its apparent the man raped the girl and it takes a special person to defend that rapist. Its also a person who acts as voice for raped women.

I think you get what Im saying and my view isnt gonna change.

What you're saying is that she somehow condones his actions because she defended him in court and that is ridiculous.

 

Charles Manson had a defense attorney. Ted Bundy had an attorney who he told he had killed way more people than he was even on trial for and his attorney still did his best to defend him. Why? Because if the system is working properly than it doesn't who the defendant is or what crime they are accused of. 

 

That doesn't makes these lawyers bad people. it means that they have faith in, and respect the integrity of the legal system that they operate in.



Bet with Adamblaziken:

I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.

Around the Network
DialgaMarine on 02 November 2016

At this point, I'm just wondering how many of her die hard supporters are going to be signing up for the military after she becomes president and declares war on Russia because of her own narcism.



0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon

Lafiel on 02 November 2016
pokoko said:

Yeah, I get what you're saying and I stand against it absolutely and completely.  The Sixth Amendment is a vital part of the foundation of this country.  No one should ever be denied those rights because it seems "apparent".  We're just going to have to agree to disagree because I will never, ever support what you want in this regard.  There are damn good reasons why the founding fathers put it in the Constitution in the first place.  

Frankly, I'm shocked that any citizen in any civilized country would stand against that principle.  I'd just assumed that the right to a fair trial was something everyone believed in.  

Feels like he just tries hard to use that to attack Clinton's character, yet I feel this is a positive thing she did. Those that are guiltiest in the eye of the public need this representation the most and many a lawyer would try to wiggle their way out of a case like this, as people like Puggsly want to use that against them.



CaptainExplosion2 on 02 November 2016

Info Wars is about as trustworthy as a Nazi giving insight into Hanuka.



pokoko on 02 November 2016

Is Alex Jones the guy who did the videos showing the Army Corp of Engineers moving equipment while trying to frame it as something sinister?

If so, I need to look for more of his work because that was hilarious.



Around the Network
Chris Hu on 02 November 2016
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
Chris Hu said:

Nope, none of those news sources earn their income by selling snake oil plus they have actuall journalist.

Bahahaha! Actual journalists! I think I teared up a bit there. In all seriousness Infowars was substantially better in the mid to late 2000's before it became too big but I will sure as hell take what they say with less of a grain of salt than any of the major corporate owned media.

Well since I'm sane I like to get my news from actual news sources not sites that are full of bogus info and are run by  snake oil salesman and conspiracy nuts.



KLAMarine on 02 November 2016
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
KLAMarine said:

I doubt that.

Watch a few shows instead of listening to soundbytes. 

What's Info Wars got that MSNBC, CNN, and Fox don't?



Nirvana_Nut85 on 02 November 2016
Chris Hu said:
Nirvana_Nut85 said:

Bahahaha! Actual journalists! I think I teared up a bit there. In all seriousness Infowars was substantially better in the mid to late 2000's before it became too big but I will sure as hell take what they say with less of a grain of salt than any of the major corporate owned media.

Well since I'm sane I like to get my news from actual news sources not sites that are full of bogus info and are run by  snake oil salesman and conspiracy nuts.

Please advise in this day and age what is considered a non biased reputtable news source? Oh sane one.



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Aura7541 on 02 November 2016
pokoko said:
Is Alex Jones the guy who did the videos showing the Army Corp of Engineers moving equipment while trying to frame it as something sinister?

If so, I need to look for more of his work because that was hilarious.

Here's some satirical commentary on the same incident from a Youtuber I follow a lot:



CaptainExplosion2 on 02 November 2016
pokoko said:
Is Alex Jones the guy who did the videos showing the Army Corp of Engineers moving equipment while trying to frame it as something sinister?

If so, I need to look for more of his work because that was hilarious.

Yeah, he's pretty much nothing but a complete psycopath who thinks everything is out to get us.