hang on a second, can you direct me to these posts of spurge and trucks saying "job well done"? I brought them up because I was certain they said you've been absent, but then when you said they congratulated you, I thought maybe I misread, but now I've re-read it again, and all they've said is that your pretty absent.
I think spurge said it's consistent with last game, but still quiet.
trucks said you had good activity at the start but you've since faded, and your logic about prof being town was weird.

Well, I've played enough games to know that I've seen this exact post from mafia multiple times. The talk of derailment, the "you have nothing on me", and the posts being detrimental. This doesn't make me feel any better about you.

It's VERY unnerving to see you write something that basically says "my posts have no real merit, and I laugh at people who are trying to scumhunt"

How is an inactive player not a threat? A would say an inactive mafia is a major threat. Lurking mafia is a meme because it works. It's worked here plently of times. 

Who is going to get killed day 1? Spurge or xander? I couldn't figure it out with the grammar you used above.

Answer: I'm spending so much time on zero, because all I know is that I'm pretty much by myself at the moment. I will probably get killed tonight, and I need to put most of my activity in today, because it's unlikely I'll see a tomorrow. So me clearing even one player to myself, is a huge success for me, because it helps my "team" of me, which I can only 100% rely on.  

1) I don't. They're praising me for some reason but that's they're reasoning. Who knows why? (See above post for info about what I think about my own posts).

Here's what I said on zero (Not going to determine Zero's allignment (I.E Mafia or Town) 'cause I'm not sure. He could just as easily be a town citizen as Prof. Seems like it to me anyways.) Yes I did say his likkely to be down but I did not comment further 'cause I'm not sure. Once again I'm not sure why they're praising me. Trucks does seem to be piggybacking of Spurge a bit too much though. So far you are the only person who I'm almost sure is town. This is quite a drastic change from all the games I've seen you in.

2) I was mafia in the Round 71 (The one which took place exactly a year ago hosted by Trucks if I'm right). Was on the same team as you.

xander is so inactive he's not a threat.

Something about this line is coming across extremely scummy. It's almost as if you already know he's town.

You think the same otherwise you would have voted for him.

I'd rather prod everyone else as hard as I can before I settle on a lurker. That doesn't mean Zander isn't a threat.

Additionally I did say above that I would be ok with lynching Zander as well.

But Id still like u to respond to the post I put above, that it seems you missed. It was about how spurge and trucks didn't actually praise you

Erm...where did I ever say that Spurge can get killed day 1? I only mentioned Xander. Do you think you're Einstein? 'Cause you've had an extremly condescending point of view throughout the whole thread. Get over yourself.

Anyways, you've literally said one thing in the above post and yet your actions say otherwise.

Anyways let me get this straight, you're attacking zero because it boosts your ego? That's petty if true.

Now for the heavy hitters:

1) It's how I've played my last two games. One of which I was town and the other in which I was Mafia. Might as well flip a coin.

2) Except Xander is a totally different type of inactive, lol xD. 

I mean, lynching a lurker does not always pan out, but sometimes it does. I think personally it's better to lynch an inactive over someone who is active. Mr.P seems to be more active but I can't tell if he's actually reading the thread. He said I didn't consider xander a threat, but in the very line where i vote mr.P I also say that I'd lynch xander. 

So, between trucks and linkz, can you summarize your cases briefly, just so that the zeroprof wall can be abated a bit?

Xander is so inactive that he's not a threat. Last game was a total fluke and spurge was the one that carried everything through.  I just wasn't sure, I don't know why you're getting all riled up.

I said one thing and my actions say otherwise? Can you expound upon this because I honestly, respectfully, don't know what you're referring to.

Who said anything about me attacking zero because it boosts my ego? It has nothing to do with that. What I mean is, it doesn't matter to me if our argument is "unbearable for other people", because I know I'm town, and it's my job to find scum, and if I can clear zero in my own head, then I can focus on other people. Because I don't know any of your alignments, so I can't really trust anything you guys say. I can only trust that I'm looking for scum. I don't even know where you're getting this assumption from.

1 Yeah I know, it's called a null-tell. It doesn't matter if you're town or scum, you will post the same way. Although I did look at our game 71 together and you seemed to be HoSing and voting for people on day 1. Again though, it's a null-tell. 

2 I'm still not getting why you think he's not a threat. 

If you were to vote someone today, who are your top suspects?