Screams fake to me. All the info it contains are basically all the leaks we got. 0 new information.

I have already explained that with mathematics backing it up, so I would prefer not to do so again.

the maths for stronger transitors and less space yes, but not how the transitors capable of doing it with much higher processing and voltage, would be cheaper and consume less energy.

Uh. What? I explained everything. And I won't be doing so again.
I showed how it could potentially offer the projected performace based on all the information we know whilst potentially being cheaper to manufacture using mathematics.
Not sure what else I could say and if there is nothing of value else to add, then this discussion is over.

Perma, you never explained how better transitors would be cheaper.

If you say better transistors... As in transistors that operate at a higher operating frequency, then I actually already have.

?

So I'm lost. I haven't seem tou explaining where a higher quality transistor is cheaper to produce (considering we are looking at both system on a similar timeline)