By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 19 July 2016
Edit Thread
Pemalite said:
DonFerrari said:

the maths for stronger transitors and less space yes, but not how the transitors capable of doing it with much higher processing and voltage, would be cheaper and consume less energy.

Uh. What? I explained everything. And I won't be doing so again.
I showed how it could potentially offer the projected performace based on all the information we know whilst potentially being cheaper to manufacture using mathematics.
Not sure what else I could say and if there is nothing of value else to add, then this discussion is over.

Perma, you never explained how better transitors would be cheaper.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."