No, that's not what he said.  He mentions nothing about the word enhancement for a majority of games, he just mentions support.  Again, this just needs to be clarified by Sony.

You're right, its a game by game case but even for a game which isn't CPU bound its an unrealistic expectation to expect double FPS on most of sonys AAA exclusives.

I doubt it; its biggest upgrade is its new gpu which will retail for consumers at $200 (and I'm sure Sony is getting a much cheaper bulk rate on it). With the rest of its enhancements being more subtle, I'd bet good money this will retail for the original $400 of the PS4 (by which point the original will have its price permanently slashed to $300).

Unless a game is running with an unlocked frame rate (which I doubt many are), I don't expect any existing games to see any real improvement with the Neo. The only exceptions would be games that stutter or drop frames because the APU cannot keep up. I also don't expect any developers to go back and modify and recertify their old games to patch in Neo support, unless they really think it will somehow generate more sales.

Also, I still expect to see a PS4 slim announced / released this year. The tech in the PS4 is old by computer standards.

I am wondering how much of the timing has to due with countering the NX release in Q1 2017?

Quote: "Both PS4 variants will also support its forthcoming virtual reality headset, which will go on sale later this year."

“small but manageable” amount of extra work when creating a game for both" - HA PR!

Now the NX have a "One less problem" to deal with if they keep its March Release Date. 

Funny, people complaining about this..... but for Scorpio it is fine! Agendas in check!?

That made me wondering, too. Look at the wording: he said "but". If he said "small and manageable" it would sound pretty easy to do so, but that littlte word "but" arises an implification that porting games isn't that easy. But I could be misinterpreting it and overdramatizing this, as well. Just something that came to my mind.

Why would anyone complain about this when they were dealing with a different architecture with PS3 and 360.... Taking way more effort and knowledge. Cell was notoriously difficult to deal with, yet they did it. Why did nobody complain back then. This is a manufactured complaint spread by the media in an effort to push a more level competition between xbox and PS. 

So after all the only reason FOR that thing is more horse power in order to achieve some higher frame rates. And games need to be redone and rereleasd then, right? Slow claps, Sony, slow claps. I wonder how anyone could be willingly pay so much money for something of such insignificance.