Honestly, this is the first time I became skeptic with the wife victim.
I feel like Amber Heard had a lot of holes in her story and she's now using social media as a platform to bring Johnny Depp on a trial by public.
LAPD checking her, no evidence to conclude there was an abuse while her friend of 13 years who happened to be the witness said there was swelling and reddening on her face.
Then her lawyers saying she wasn't intending to file DV charges until Johnny Depp's PR Team slandered her when infact divorcing him just two days after Johnny Depp's mom died is IMO enough for the media without Depp's PR team's intervention to haunt and dig on her life story to get the truth behind why she divorced him not to mention the gap in their ages would seriously imply gold-digging.
And the fact she didn't file charges so she maintained their privacy so as not to impact Depp's career while asking for spousal support when she had no kids with him and that she is healthy and physically(i mean in terms of beauty she is a keeper) able to work without Depp's help and when Depp and his lawyers rejected it, the DV charges were filed coincidentally?
I mean, by using a bit of that logic, I am just not convinced. And I usually lean on being a feminist. SO SORRY. I think this is a Gone Girl situation.