By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - So, Super Mario 3D World is still on the top of rated exclusives this gen...

Pavolink said:
Neodegenerate said:

If you didn't care about ranking you wouldn't have made the thread.  Boy do those goalposts move.

Yeah, those goalposts move very quickly. We went from scores to fractions.

I am starting to think you either don't know how this works or that you are being deliberately obtuse.  For the sake of the former I will try to explain.

You say: SM3DW is still the highest rated exclusive of the gen.  Yes I am paraphrasing because you said "top of rated exclusives" which amounts to the same thing.

Everyone else calls you on that with the fact that on Metacritics ranking list the 93 for UC4 is considered higher than the 93 for SM3DW.  You can tell this by the rankings they have on the previously linked page.

Yet, you defend by saying people have to incorporate fractions.  Which the site itself incorporates based on the rankings they give.  Otherwise, they would just list all the 93s alphabetically and mention that it is listed as such.

When you aggregate numbers you have to take fractions into consideration.  When you display things you want them to look clean.  Fractions and decimals aren't clean.  Therefore, for aesthetics, they leave them out.  Still with me?

Therefore your statement that SM3DW is "still on top" is actually wrong, and now you are defending by trying to move your goalposts.  See?



Around the Network

Dat uncharted 4 user score though 😨😣



Pavolink said:
Teeqoz said:

The fractions are a part of the score.

Not here.

Have you heard of truncation?

 

To truncate:

to shorten (a number) by dropping a digit or digits:

The numbers 1.4142 and 1.4987 can both be truncated to 1.4.
Similarly, the numbers 93.xxxx and 93.yyyy can both be truncated to 93. Mathemagics!


vivster said:
Waiting for a petition to remove the 10/10 reviews on Mario because it's not a true Mario 64.

We don't go that low.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Pavolink said:
princevenom said:
what a failed attempt for trolling lol
sorry op

Do you consider a troll that 3D World is still on top? Wow, so much hate for the game.

not on top nope 



Around the Network
Teeqoz said:
Pavolink said:

Yeah, those goalposts move very quickly. We went from scores to fractions.

The fractions are a part of the score.

How about looking at it this way: 83 Critics gave Mario 93. 91 Critics gave Uncharted 93. Therefore 93/83 vs. 93/91. Mario has higher average which means the reviews scored higher on average (talking about fractions).

OR Uncharted has more reviews so it should be on top. Either way I don't care lol.



Neodegenerate said:
Pavolink said:

Yeah, those goalposts move very quickly. We went from scores to fractions.

I am starting to think you either don't know how this works or that you are being deliberately obtuse.  For the sake of the former I will try to explain.

You say: SM3DW is still the highest rated exclusive of the gen.  Yes I am paraphrasing because you said "top of rated exclusives" which amounts to the same thing.

Everyone else calls you on that with the fact that on Metacritics ranking list the 93 for UC4 is considered higher than the 93 for SM3DW.  You can tell this by the rankings they have on the previously linked page.

Yet, you defend by saying people have to incorporate fractions.  Which the site itself incorporates based on the rankings they give.  Otherwise, they would just list all the 93s alphabetically and mention that it is listed as such.

When you aggregate numbers you have to take fractions into consideration.  When you display things you want them to look clean.  Fractions and decimals aren't clean.  Therefore, for aesthetics, they leave them out.  Still with me?

Therefore your statement that SM3DW is "still on top" is actually wrong, and now you are defending by trying to move your goalposts.  See?

Is it really that bad for you that 3D World shares the same metacritic score as Uncharted 4?

 

Teeqoz said:
Pavolink said:

Not here.

Have you heard of truncation?

 

To truncate:

to shorten (a number) by dropping a digit or digits:

The numbers 1.4142 and 1.4987 can both be truncated to 1.4.
Similarly, the numbers 93.xxxx and 93.yyyy can both be truncated to 93. Mathemagics!

You are giving me the reason.

 

Nogamez said:
Dat uncharted 4 user score though 😨😣

Meaningless. User score does not matter as it is full of trolls.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


The replies in this thread are a great read haahahah



Ka-pi96 said:
Darwinianevolution said:
Really? I thought SmashU was higher, apparently it's below SM3dW by just one point. Anyway, great games both of them (that I won't be able to play because I don't own either console :P )

:o Why not? I thought you did?

I don't have neither the time or the money to own more than one console, and that's my 3DS.



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

Wildcard36qs said:
Teeqoz said:

The fractions are a part of the score.

How about looking at it this way: 83 Critics gave Mario 93. 91 Critics gave Uncharted 93. Therefore 93/83 vs. 93/91. Mario has higher average which means the reviews scored higher on average (talking about fractions).

OR Uncharted has more reviews so it should be on top. Either way I don't care lol.

Uhh... 83 critics didn't give SM3DW a 93. The 93 is the weighted average of 83 scores. Same thing for UC4.

 

Going by your method, Sonic Boom (3DS) has 47/21~=~2.24, which is higher than SM3DW's 93/83 ~=~ 1.12 ...and something is obviously not right about that lol.