By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - The Titanic, what you probably didn't know

 

I watched the video

Yes 2 25.00%
 
No 6 75.00%
 
Total:8
Pavolink on 02 November 2015

Do you mean the Olympus? I can see being truth. The shock among some points more about how they failed in their plan than the sinking of the ship.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Around the Network
archer9234 on 02 November 2015

Except with the name switch conspiracy was screwed over, by seeing the etched in hull number of the Titanic. In many different documentaries. It's like the Moon faking theories. You're telling me, 1969 had the tech to visually remove all evidence to set limitations, EVERYWHERE? We're talking about the 60's were they couldn't key bluescreen out properly, in Star Trek. Star Trek TOS was using the top of the line effects house. And you can easily see when sets ends in any show, of that era. Even with space backgrounds. The tech was no where there, to pull off this cover up. Nowadays, yeah. It wasn't possible till mid 90's, at the earliest.



Adinnieken on 02 November 2015
NoGenlefBhind said:
smh... the media in America is not owned by a select few powerful people who like to control what you think...and the Socratic irony in you saying so is that you have no contrary proof to demonstrate that if what you state is true, YOU'RE not the one being controlled and told what to think..lol...how do the rest of us know for certain that you're not part of it... I mean why else would you be trying to govern people's opinion about a ship that sank more than 100 years ago. Who paid you off... who got you.. I wanna know damnitt!!
... also, instead of trying to intentionally mislead people with semantics, you should be honest. When you say that we've committed soldiers to Syria, you know full well what that sentence implies.. that US soldiers will by fighting hand to hand, you also know full well that isn't true but you still go right ahead and say it. We've sent roughly a few dozen special forces there to advice and help train. That's it.
It's really annoying when people are intentionally dishonest.

.. and as far as the Titanic thing, while it's certainly an interesting premise and not all that unreasonable given it's conspiratorial nature, there's more than enough information to be found that utterly debunks all of it.
Hey.. what do you know.. here comes some now:
http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_34_Titanic_switch_theory_03.html

Conspiracy theorists are kinda like muppets, they're entertaining for a second, but the more you listen the more you realize they're not really in control of their own strings.

And there you go, spreading your misinformation.  Your falsehoods.  Lies.  BS!

Muppets don't have strings.  Muppets are operated by a hand operating the mouth typically of the actor/muppetier, and the limbs (arms) being operated by the muppetier or other muppetiers.  Likewise, Muppets are entertaining.  Have you never watched the original episodes of The Muppet Show?  Go.  Watch.

Enough of your tripe!

How, of all things, am I supposed to believe anything you say when you don't even understand how muppets are operated. 

Pfft!  Pfft I say!



NoGenlefBhind on 02 November 2015
Adinnieken said:
NoGenlefBhind said:
smh... the media in America is not owned by a select few powerful people who like to control what you think...and the Socratic irony in you saying so is that you have no contrary proof to demonstrate that if what you state is true, YOU'RE not the one being controlled and told what to think..lol...how do the rest of us know for certain that you're not part of it... I mean why else would you be trying to govern people's opinion about a ship that sank more than 100 years ago. Who paid you off... who got you.. I wanna know damnitt!!
... also, instead of trying to intentionally mislead people with semantics, you should be honest. When you say that we've committed soldiers to Syria, you know full well what that sentence implies.. that US soldiers will by fighting hand to hand, you also know full well that isn't true but you still go right ahead and say it. We've sent roughly a few dozen special forces there to advice and help train. That's it.
It's really annoying when people are intentionally dishonest.

.. and as far as the Titanic thing, while it's certainly an interesting premise and not all that unreasonable given it's conspiratorial nature, there's more than enough information to be found that utterly debunks all of it.
Hey.. what do you know.. here comes some now:
http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_34_Titanic_switch_theory_03.html

Conspiracy theorists are kinda like muppets, they're entertaining for a second, but the more you listen the more you realize they're not really in control of their own strings.

And there you go, spreading your misinformation.  Your falsehoods.  Lies.  BS!

Muppets don't have strings.  Muppets are operated by a hand operating the mouth typically of the actor/muppetier, and the limbs (arms) being operated by the muppetier or other muppetiers.  Likewise, Muppets are entertaining.  Have you never watched the original episodes of The Muppet Show?  Go.  Watch.

Enough of your tripe!

How, of all things, am I supposed to believe anything you say when you don't even understand how muppets are operated. 

Pfft!  Pfft I say!

hey.. nicely played. My faux pas on the muppet thing.... I have much to learn about the inner workings of the anthropomorphic crowd. I will certainly do my homework before attempting to use them in any future similes. 



V-r0cK on 02 November 2015

Tag for later, thanks for sharing!



Around the Network
NoGenlefBhind on 02 November 2015
padib said:
NoGenlefBhind said:
smh... the media in America is not owned by a select few powerful people who like to control what you think...and the Socratic irony in you saying so is that you have no contrary proof to demonstrate that if what you state is true, YOU'RE not the one being controlled and told what to think..lol...how do the rest of us know for certain that you're not part of it... I mean why else would you be trying to govern people's opinion about a ship that sank more than 100 years ago. Who paid you off... who got you.. I wanna know damnitt!!
... also, instead of trying to intentionally mislead people with semantics, you should be honest. When you say that we've committed soldiers to Syria, you know full well what that sentence implies.. that US soldiers will by fighting hand to hand, you also know full well that isn't true but you still go right ahead and say it. We've sent roughly a few dozen special forces there to advice and help train. That's it.
It's really annoying when people are intentionally dishonest.

.. and as far as the Titanic thing, while it's certainly an interesting premise and not all that unreasonable given it's conspiratorial nature, there's more than enough information to be found that utterly debunks all of it.
Hey.. what do you know.. here comes some now:
http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_34_Titanic_switch_theory_03.html

Conspiracy theorists are kinda like muppets, they're entertaining for a second, but the more you listen the more you realize they're not really in control of their own strings.

Do you prefer I not mention the possibility?

When I said boots on the ground, I just said boots on the ground, implying that there would be boots on the ground. They will likely be training but whether they are training or fighting is neither here nor there in what I was trying to say. I was trying to say that now was a bad time for them to go in because now Russia is there, and America and Russia are not officially cooperating. That's why imho it's very prone to accidents and blaming. I wasn't intending on misleading anyone.

Also, your link is very interesting, and I'll read it. It's important to read and get informed, the more you know the better you can judge.

In all honesty, you just made me feel bad. That's about the classiest reply I've ever received after leaving an argumentative and somewhat insulting comment first. 

I take back the muppet thing... (I used 'em wrong anyway)



the_dark_lewd on 02 November 2015

The fact that you used the phrase "too suspicious to be untrue" saved me a lot of time watching the video.