By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - [FORBES] Could Bloodborne Be The Anti- "Order: 1886?"

http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2015/02/24/could-bloodborne-be-the-anti-order-1886/

As Paul Tassi reminds us, Sony and the PS4 has a bit of an exclusive problem. Microsoft MSFT -0.47% has one too, of course, but right now, we’re talking about Sony. It started at launch, with the passable Killzone: Shadow Fall and the abominable Knack. Infamous: Second Son was just pretty enjoyable, if not spectacular, and Driveclub was an unmitigated disaster. The Order: 1886 is being panned right now, and Sony needs to do some work if it hopes to regain its reputation as the place to go for the best exclusives on the market. It won’t have to wait long for another shot, however: we’ve got Bloodborne coming out next month, and while mass appeal might be a bit of a question, it just might be the antidote to the overwrought and generally boring Order: 1886.

The delays and pseudo-Victorian setting makes the comparison particularly apt: Sony exclusives appear to be going for a certain stylistic consistency, at the least. That’s where the similarities end: Bloodborne is a Dark Souls-style third person hack and slash RPG, while The Order: 1886 was a story-driven cover shooter heavy on the cutscenes and low on most everything else. When I first saw Bloodborne, I thought it looked a little silly, what with the hammer/longsword combinations, outlandish monsters, and relatively spartan environments. But in the wake of The Order: 1886, I find myself cautiously optimistic about what looks like a game a little more willing to let the player control the action.

Here’s the most important thing: everything I’ve seen about Bloodborne so far just smacks of videogame. The graphics may be pretty in their own right, but the style is a world removed from the photo-realism attempts in The Order: 1886. In Erik Kain’s preview, he praises the same show-not-tell storytelling of the Souls series, again a stark contrast from The Order. The Order suffered from an identity crisis: part movie, part game, unsure of how to pull either one of those off. What I’ve seen of Bloodborne, however, is at the very least secure in what it is. For one thing, it’s called itself “Bloodborne,” which is absurd. But like Dark Souls, it seems comfortable to put a great deal of faith in the player, whether in deciphering a complex combat system or parsing through an opaque story. Originality is important when you spend the entire runtime wresting control out of the player’s hands, but well-designed systems win the day in a gameplay-driven title. Here’s hoping that Bloodborne trends towards the latter.

It’s hard to imagine a title like Bloodborne carrying the same mass appeal that I think The Order: 1886 was aiming for, but that might be less important right now. Like Dark Souls it, it’s aimed squarely at a traditional video game crowd, which is theoretically the demographic Sony marketed the PS4 too all along. The AAA industry, in general, needs to work a little bit to win the faith of those gamers back, so here’s hoping this scratches that itch for at least a moment.

We’re all just biding our time until Uncharted 4, of course. I have my concerns about that one too — the  head, down, super-serious looking Nathan Drake that we’ve seen splattered all over every announcement for more than a year doesn’t mesh with the charming rogue I’ve become accustomed too — but I have a good deal of faith in Naughty Dog.



Around the Network

Yeah, i am having problems posting the whole thing u.u



It has always been the opposite. Will get better reviews and sell less.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

FORBES...contributor

Edit: It’s funny how people here put “Forbes” in the thread title in an attempt to convey the article's importance or legitimacy, when these articles are rarely written by Forbes Staff, but random Forbes Contributors.



the game should be awesome and if it isnt,then i shall cry

cant wait too next month so i can see how it stacks up to the rest of the souls series

I hope its more so like Demon Souls



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

Around the Network

i hope it will get awesome reviews that will help it sell a lot more.



"Sony needs to do some work if it hopes to regain its reputation as the place to go for the best exclusives on the market".

Ok so Microsoft Sony and PC are known for being the worst and weakest panned places to go for exclusives in general as opposed to Sony the whole time?, I'm not buying that crap of a line from someone at Forbes.



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

PwerlvlAmy said:
the game should be awesome and if it isnt,then i shall cry

cant wait too next month so i can see how it stacks up to the rest of the souls series

I hope its more so like Demon Souls

It WILL be awesome, just like The Order:



 

The PS5 Exists. 


vivster said:
It has always been the opposite. Will get better reviews and sell less.





Driveclub is awesome. If they are going to talk about its botched launch they should not have a double standard and declare Halo:MCC a unmitigatable disaster. If GT7 has the polished tracks, vehicles, and graphics Driveclub has with all of the customization and wide range of vehicles GT games always have it will be the best racer ever made.



End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)

Wii- 72 million   3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases

360- 37 million   Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak

PS3- 29 million  Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut