riderz13371 said:
I disagree when you say they barely did any work. Why is their logo on the box art? Why was it always people from 343 studios presenting the game instead of the people from the studio who, as you say, did the most work? Why does the wiki say, and I quote "The collection was primarily developed by 343 Industries"??? 343 is also the one credited with having made the online networking, which is whats wrong with the game right now according to some people (the online). It's safe to say 343 had the most work done on this and is the main person to blame. |
I could write the article on wiki, would that make it a fact hell no. I watched every vidoc and saw every peice of info on the game.
343 did not develop the port for cea
343 did not develop the halo 2 PC port, or halo 2 anniversary
343 did not develop the ports for halo 3 or 4
343 did not develop the 6 remade maps or forge
so how in the world does that translate into them doing most of the work. And of course they get to put their name on it. It's there game, their ip. They could have outsourced 100% of the game and still put their name on it if they wanted too.
I find it do funny when people bend the truth and/or get heated over a game they don't own, on a system they don't own.
Halo MCC will sell 5+ million copies(including digital)
halo 5 will sell 10 million copies(including digital)
x1 will pass ps4 in USA, and UK.