5551 posts since 17/11/08
trashleg on 21 September 2014
kowenicki said:
trashleg said:
...whose party was elected into Holyrood in 2007 with a landslide victory. Who spent his entire political career pushing for an agenda for those who supported him, which he delivered to them on Thursday. Job done, he did what he promised. Gave Scotland the choice.
|
...and lost.
|
Depends on perspective. He, personally, wanted independence. But it wasn't just about him. He promised the referendum, but put it in the hands of the people of Scotland to make the decision for themselves.
Better together might have won the referendum, but YES Scotland sure won the campaign. 45%, thats not as small a percentage as it was even 6 months ago. I'm telling you, it'll come up again.
Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
5551 posts since 17/11/08
trashleg on 21 September 2014
kowenicki said:
It probably will. I suppose you think its democratic that due to 1.6m people (2% or so of the populaton) the way the UK should be governed should now go through a big change, shouldnt they ask the other 62m first? I'm pretty tired of pandering to minority interests to be honest.
I hate Salmond for this and, dont get me wrong, I think the Westminster politicians and are weak for essentially caving in. I would have allowed the Scots to leave if thats what they wanted. The No campaign should have been just that... "stay or leave" not a plea with treats and promises to appease people who dont want to be part of the UK.
So now, due to this appeasement, we will have another layer of government all over the UK at huge cost of time and money (yippee) and all it really does is create jobs for the boys... politicians. We have too much government already, another layer really isnt that interesting or productive.
|
That's the point, as 5.3 million collectively, there are issues that Scotland feels quite differently to the rest of the UK on, that we just get swept away with what everybody else votes.
I for one truly hope this DOES lead to a change in politics nation-wide. I think it's critical for people outside of London to have more ground-level representation. Absolutely. And I'm happy that this referendum and the West Lothian Question are making people demand changes to the way they're governed. The power belongs to the people, and they're waking up to realise just how much they could/should have.
Westminster politics is shite. Archaic, elitist playground as I've said before.
Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
5551 posts since 17/11/08
trashleg on 21 September 2014
Vikki said:
kowenicki said:
trashleg said:
That's the point, as 5.3 million collectively, there are issues that Scotland feels quite differently to the rest of the UK on, that we just get swept away with what everybody else votes.
|
No, there really isnt. I simply don't accept that.
|
A majority of England voted Tory in 2010. Scotland only voted in 1 Tory constituency out of 59 in 2010. Is that not enough evidence that we have different opinions to the rest of the UK? Infact, without Scottish influence, the Tories would have had a majority in 2010. Even the Scottish Tories themselves are far more liberal than those right wing maniacs you have down in Westminster.
There are clear differences in the way Scottish people vote to those in England.
|
This.
There's a reason SNP won on a clear majority in 2011. Westminster simply wasn't representing the electorate.
Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.