You came over to this thread too? suspicious.

lol cant stay away from nitendo based threads, bit of a fanboy

I have seen so many people saying that don't have playing on a nintendo console since NES or SNES and they are fine missing SOME nintendo games. They are now with PS/MS consoles and they never "looked back" because Nintendo didn't do anything do caught their attention once again and the reasons are:

No third party support (even when some series are suffering a quality decline)

Graphics (even when the difference are some pixels, particles and textures rendering)

No voice acting

No violence, blood, etc...

Too many cartoonish characters

And i ask myself... what about the game?! Did you played? Watched the gameplay? Because I found these reasons so futile, that i don't even know if some of you are really serious. When you don't play a nintendo console you are not only missing a bunch of platformer games. Instead of turning your back when you see the nintendo logo (or mario's hat), you should see the game and when i say "see" i am not talking about the visuals aspects

Note: I am not talking only about Wii U since i mentioned NES and SNES. Nintendo portable consoles are consoles too, so every single nintendo console is included

I guess we're similar in that way.

You are under valuing the graphics part. Few people are willing to spend hundreds of dollars on something that has the same power as something they've already owned for 5+ years. It simply doesn't seem to be good value for money and as games become more refined on the PS4/XB1, this gap will only become bigger. Hell, Silent Hills, Uncharted 4, Drive Club etc are showing the XB1 as being weak, let alone the WiiU. 

That's a really bad reason to not buy any more Pokemon games. The reason they didn't start out with more than one file was because of limitations on the GameBoy. That's no excuse now, but if you both wanted to play it all the time, would you really want to share it. Again it's not an amazing reason, but there is some.

Actually, it's a very good reason not to buy more Pokemon games. It's the failure of gamers to take a stand on principle that lets game developers and publishers and console makers get away with shit. They know gamers are addicted to this crack so they can get away with consumer abusive practices and there might be some grumbles but they know in the end the gamers will still buy the games. I was fully prepared to not buy PS4 if Sony went down the same DRM path as MS was planning with Xb one. And if Sony had introduced DRM like MS, which would have been a conspiracy between MS and Sony fully supported by 3rd party devs, the PR push to sell this consumer abuse to gamers would have been huge and they would have got away with it. And there were legions of MS Xbox fans willing to eat up that MS DRM shit and call it the finest Belgian chocolate.

If Sony introduced DRM to make it not possible to swap, give away or sell the next TLOU or UC4 I would not be buying the game. If they made it not possible for more than one account on a given PS4 able to play the game I would not buy the game.

It's irrelevant why this limitation existed in the past. The developer and Nintendo are dicks for not using the technology available to remove unjustified restrictions like this. It is also irrelevant whether I want to play the game at the same time as my son. It should be possible to have multiple game saves on one cartridge regardless. If we wanted to coop, or compete or whatever you can do with Pokemon games, then sure we'd buy 2 copies, but that does not justify retaining this game save limitation.