By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Is Xenoblade X and Bayonetta 2 the best looking games to ever grace a Nintendo system?

 

Even better than what Nintendo can and has done themselves?

yes 97 24.87%
 
no 200 51.28%
 
let me explain 36 9.23%
 
see results 56 14.36%
 
Total:389
curl-6 on 21 June 2014

Anyone who  thinks X looks like a PS2 game is either just trying to stir up trouble, or doesn't remember what PS2 games look like. 

 

Roma said:
it still amazes me that people still don't know that Xenoblade and X are not Nintendo first party game

Yes, they are. Nintendo owns Monolith Soft.



Around the Network
Samus Aran on 21 June 2014

Why do some Sony fans come to the Nintendo section just to claim a certain Wii U game looks like a PS2 game? Is it that boring over there in the Sony section?

teigaga on 21 June 2014
Roma said:
it still amazes me that people still don't know that Xenoblade and X are not Nintendo first party game

sure they look good but not the best Nintendo has made although they are the biggest in terms of scale


Is it 3rd party? Otherwise I don't think people distinguish between 1st and 2nd party.



teigaga on 21 June 2014
Roma said:
it still amazes me that people still don't know that Xenoblade and X are not Nintendo first party game

sure they look good but not the best Nintendo has made although they are the biggest in terms of scale


Is it 3rd party? Otherwise I don't think people distinguish between 1st and 2nd party.



teigaga on 21 June 2014

Mario Kart 8 Looks better then both

X's graphics seem incosistent

Beyonetta doesn't have any wow factor. Its just a good looking game.



Around the Network
zippy on 21 June 2014
Samus Aran said:

Why do some Sony fans come to the Nintendo section just to claim a certain Wii U game looks like a PS2 game? Is it that boring over there in the Sony section?

I think the lack of AAA PS4 games is frustrating them.



Wright on 21 June 2014

Meh. Give me Disaster 2, Monolith Soft. The first one looked great and that was on the Wii. I dare to say Raymond's face was far more detailed than some X characters judging the Threehouse thing.



Arkhandar on 21 June 2014
Wright said:

Meh. Give me Disaster 2, Monolith Soft. The first one looked great and that was on the Wii. I dare to say Raymond's face was far more detailed than some X characters judging the Threehouse thing.


It's not just the graphics. The overall character design looks uninspiring, even compared to the original Xenobalde.



Roma on 21 June 2014
curl-6 said:

Anyone who  thinks X looks like a PS2 game is either just trying to stir up trouble, or doesn't remember what PS2 games look like. 

 

Roma said:
it still amazes me that people still don't know that Xenoblade and X are not Nintendo first party game

Yes, they are. Nintendo owns Monolith Soft.

Wo0psi!! the "not" is not supposed to be there. I know very well that they are first party and that is what amazes me that people do not know until now

I mean check the second sentence which you left out of your quote



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

NoirSon on 21 June 2014

Hard to tell, they have different styles and Nintendo seems more intent on their main franchises being more colorful, while games like Bayonetta and Xenoblade Chronicles go for a more realistic fantasy look.

All the games look great what is most important is how they play. 3D Mario World and MK8 seem to have proven that already, can't wait to see how Bayonetta 2 and XCX do.