mysteryman said:
|
But being silly is what I do here on VGChartz!
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
So? | |||
Ya, excited! | 38 | 13.15% | |
House of Cod! | 11 | 3.81% | |
Kevin Spacey! | 31 | 10.73% | |
Yaaaaa! | 2 | 0.69% | |
No, not another cod! | 105 | 36.33% | |
Maybe! | 15 | 5.19% | |
Not sure | 31 | 10.73% | |
hmmmm | 10 | 3.46% | |
Looks cool | 24 | 8.30% | |
ok... | 20 | 6.92% | |
Total: | 287 |
mysteryman said:
|
But being silly is what I do here on VGChartz!
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
oniyide said:
But why? why should 3rd parties spend more time and more money on a version that probably still wont come close to selling as much as the others? They wont, it would make no sense. |
Well, yes. Exactly. That's why Nintendo home consoles since N64 are in the shape that they're in with third-party publisher support. At least with N64 and Wii, the install bases in North America were such that it was financially sensible to at least do a cheap port to Nintendo consoles. With Wii U have such a tiny install base, there is literally no financial reason that any publisher would want to invest in that business. Not until Nintendo stimulates growth of the system, which only Nintendo can do with their franchises.
PigPen said: I'm not sure if I should be excited. There is no Wii U version announced. Ghost was a mess and looked like the X360 version. I think it's time for me to give COD a rest. |
There was also no Wii U version of Black Ops II or Ghost announced ahead of time either. Activision has been really weird about that, yet they are still released after all. And there is evidence to suggest a Wii U version will again come out.