ToxicJosh said: Traditionally speaking there are 3 views on human nature: good, bad, and neutral. Conservatives tend to feel more negatively about people, liberals more positive and people who think about it realise that there are some good and some bad, and that people are probably born as a blank slate, or tabula rasa, and that how they are raised probably plays a great deal into whether or not they turn into saints or scumbags. (Notice how none of that carries any relevance to economic theories?) Personally, I think that all that human nature tells us is what the actual nature of the person holding that view is: as the only mind we get to see inside is our own. So someone who says that people are inherently lazy, selfish and only out for themselves is, in all likelihood, lazy, selfish and only out for themselves. People who think that people are naturally loving and kind are probably going to be loving and kind. The only way this plays into economic theories is that people who are greedy want to able to accumulate wealth; and therefore are more likely to want a system that enables them to do so (capitalism). People who consider everyone to be equal, are more likely to want a system that removes wealth from private hands (socialism). But really, that's stretching credulity in terms of a criticism of socialism. Sorry for the rant. |
Rubbish. What a self rightgeous view of yourself and this is evident in shaping your views.
"(Notice how none of that carries any relevance to economic theories?)"
Ofcourse it does, and is at the heart of Game Theory which has shaped modern economics.
If you have a system that doesn't account for lazy people even if only some of them are and it then doesn't take steps to stop them being lazy then they're able to "game the system" and get other people to pay for what they want/need: children, healthcare, living expenses etc.
I agree with you that capitalism doesn't take steps to prevent greed by the most capable but the above must be recognised equally rather than simply glossing over with some rubbish that people who think like this are probably just lazy and selfish themselves.
Personally I'm a right-wing leaning liberal democrat, essentially the government we have in the UK at the moment (I actually got exactly what I wanted) because I think that form of government gives a good balance between the two. Socialism however in it's purest form, like communism simply doesn't work. Capitalism equally eventually fails like we've seen although I also want to point out that pure Capitalism hasn't been tried, in a Capitalist society banks wouldn't have been bailed out or would even have needed to be as it wouldn't use a fiat currency which essentially lead to all the debt. However I'm under no doubt that pure Capitalism would eventually lead to monopolies or cabals that would ultimately have absolute power over the citizens and a reduction in growth and an increase in social inequality.