Halo was never considered or designated a Call of Duty killer.  Halo was first and foremost an offline first person shooter.  So, an offline campaign mode has been central to the games experience.  Halo 4 at least attempted to give some clarity and purpose for Halo's online multiplayer by implying that it was a training simulator.  Halo: Reach is the only Halo that sort of attempted to compete against COD by featuring a team of Spartans vs a team of Elites.

I doubt Titanfall will do as well as COD does, however it will still do exceptionally well for a online multiplayer only game. 

Dude I honestly can't play COD anymore...I'm gonna sell it because it's incredibly boring compared to Titanfall. So much fun and adrenaline.

It's very similar to COD. Even the damn kill cam is the same.

it doesnt look to different from cod 2 me. but i havnt payed so much attention, will it have medipacks or hpregenbullshit? will it have a big arsenal of Realy different weapons? can i make mods for it?
i guess its hpregenbullshit, big arsenal but just small differences and no lol mods? lol.
so yes its like bf or cod.
ohh i miss the good old times with skillbased FPS...

No. Titanfall looks bland as fuck.

I am sceptical about the bots purely from a strategic standpoint. Campers still won't camp the same way...? That's a pretty bold prediction, and honestly I don't see much of a change in how campers will camp. Campers will more than likely still do their own thing off in some random dark spot in the map. At this point it's just pure speculation, but I'd predict that bots will have more of an effect on organized teams or teams that try to dictate map and spawn control. The old strategies that worked in other FPS games might not work in Titanfall, because bots will constantly be pushing objectives... which in effect would likely shift spawns around and make it hard to impossible to lock down a map. I think your right about one thing... The AI can control the action, but how well recieved will that be by some players? Do players want the action to be dictated by a bunch of bots or actual players? I'd say this, anyone comparing Titanfall to the play of other FPS's like CoD, becuase of the variables that the AI bring into play will create a different experience. We'll see if this is viable model going forward for the genre when Titanfall is released. Again this game looks like a lot of fun, but will it have the same long lerm appeal to the players that Halo, COD, or Battlefield has had. 

I would maybe take the time to rephrase few of your assumptions :)
I generalized about the playstation fans and it is the ONLY thing that you "shown me" (actually not you only )

As far as the remaining of you points and what you replied to me about COD type of game etc. I disagree with you and you did not show my anything.

You also proven nothing by saying "COD is generaly disliked" on the internet... COD is the by the far the most selling shooter out there; therefore it is also the one people tend to speak about; and we all know who are the ones we hear the most on the internet :) (the complainers). So no, COD is not the most disliked game; it is just the most known and successful game meaning that it will also get more complains (proportionnaly to its success).

The gameplay of COD is certainly not what is the most disliked actually, it is quite the opposite and the main reason of its success.
By the way, comparing Halo to COD while talking about 2 or 3 shots deaths is just plain wrong imo. Halo and COD are actually quite different (and yes I like both gameplay type)

While I was generalized in my statement regarding Playstation fans; you are definitely doing the same regarding your oppinion of COD...

As someone who would get it on PC regardless of which console it was on (seriously, anyone who would choose a controller over a mouse and keyboard for an FPS is a nutjob :p), I don't get the hype either. So i fail to see your point?

Anyway, you shouldn't make comments about other peoples biases when you yourself have a strong one. It's rather hypocritical ^^;

While I already explained myself (and will not repeat) about my post (just read past it); I fail to see why someone with a strong oppinion could not make comments about other people having a strong oppinion...

As far as the mouse/keyboard combo; I was a big fan of that (15 years ago) but now I can say that when I'm forced to play on a PC (FPS) I'm not really enjoying it like I do with a controller. The problem is not the mouse but really the keyboard. I feel like playing a robot while moving and straffing with a keyboard compared to the analog stick.

I'm honestly confused by much of this, but I will try to respond to your points..

(a) How can you disagree with me? I literally repeated your post. Here is your post:

"- COD like, I mean, I love Halo and COD, they are both shooters but the gameplay is really different. So either kind of gameplay would be a hit with me.
- Titans, straffing, etc... I'm adding straffing because it feels like a Mechwarrior game.
- Azure powered :) Dedicated servers of course + good amount of AIs. (compared to actual shooters on consoles)
- On console.
- Xbox One exclusive
- Same people who created COD.
- The double jump (jetpack) thing; I believe and the very fast gameplay coming with it..."

Of those points, the only factors that directly refer to gameplay is its familiarity with CoD, titans, and double jumps. So, when I say "Speaking in terms purely of gameplay, it's pretty much a CoD-like game with titans and big jumps.", you must agree with me because I'm using your own words.

(b) It does not matter if CoD is liked in the real world. You weren't referring to gamers in the real world when you said "a good amount of PlayStation enthusiasts positing in the first page." When you made this post, your were specifically referring to gamers who tend to spend a relatively high amount of time on the internet (since they are members of a forum). These are the people you were referring to, so these are the people's whose opinion we must refer to. It just so happens that these type of users - those who spend a relatively high amount of time on the internet - tend to dislike CoD. If you don't believe me, check out user reviews on metacritic. No, these users do not represent the real world, but they do give a relatively decent representation of internet forumers.

Because of this, we can conclude that it's perfectly plausible for the "PlayStation enthusiasts posting in the first page" to dislike CoD. And if they dislike CoD, they must dislike it because of a reasons other than the fact that it's not on a Playstation consoles (because CoD is on Playstation console). Since you stated that Titanfall is similar to CoD, then we can also conclude that the "PlayStation enthusiasts posting in the first page" also dislike Titanfall. We can then conclude that the reason the "Playstation enthusiasts posting in the first page" dislike Titanfall is the same reason they dislike CoD, which has nothing to do with consoles exclusivity...thus, proving that your first assertion is unsupported, and likely false.

( c) Not sure what you mean about Halo, as I never mentioned Halo in our exchange. And when I did mention Halo, I explicitly stated that I prefer Halo's style of gameplay over CoD; one of the reasons being because it takes more than 2 or 3 shots to kill someone.