By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Microsoft: We Don't See Anything Better than Ryse, Forza 5 on Competing Platforms

lol you guys are killing me... Everytime someone from Microsoft says something good about their product you are posting this here hoping all the Playstation fans are going to bash it like crazy (which is what happen everytime)...

And you act like Sony does not do anything similar while talking about their products :)



Around the Network

@ Joe the bro

i cant quote on phone.

you do realise those screens are from static drawn images that are on loading screens don't you? None of those screens you posted are from any gameplay. Digital foundry, gamersyde and Dan greenwalt said its dynamic. In fact digital foundry said the dynamic lighting is technically outstanding. You can even see the dynamic lighting at work in the reflections of the cars your racing against. Theirs some forza 5 giffs going around from hood gameplay that looks like real life. Ive never seen reflections and lighting like that ever in a video game.



DestructorGT said:
battlefield 4 looks years ahead of kilzone sf

What's your point? BF4 is on PS4 also...



They also didnt see an issue with always on and always connected and not being abke to sell games privately



obligatory
Gameplay > Graphics and
art direction > sheer technical prowess



Around the Network
orniletter said:
riderz13371 said:
Killzone Shadow Fall. Glorious 1080P 60 FPS. Nothing even comes close to it.


30 fps in Singleplayer (If I´m not mistaken)

Yes I know I already said that in another comment.



iceland said:
COD:Ghosts>Killzone

Well, honestly; I can understand why Sony enthousiasts are hyped like crazy about Killzone but (and I already gave my oppinion on that) it is nothing better than Crysis 3; Forza 5, Titanfall, Ryse etc...

Now I do not know if COD: Ghost is really better than Killzone graphicaly. While Killzone is playing the super safe way (Sci-Fiction) which is always very easy to look impressive; it is still very nice (even if he looks as boring as the other ones, personnal oppinion here no need to post a 10 pages argumentations). COD: Ghost on the other hand focusing on the gameplay; which will be as fantastic as the other ones but maybe less on the graphical side.



Imaginedvl said:
iceland said:
COD:Ghosts>Killzone

Well, honestly; I can understand why Sony enthousiasts are hyped like crazy about Killzone but (and I already gave my oppinion on that) it is nothing better than Crysis 3; Forza 5, Titanfall, Ryse etc...

Now I do not know if COD: Ghost is really better than Killzone graphicaly. While Killzone is playing the super safe way (Sci-Fiction) which is always very easy to look impressive; it is still very nice (even if he looks as boring as the other ones, personnal oppinion here no need to post a 10 pages argumentations). COD: Ghost on the other hand focusing on the gameplay; which will be as fantastic as the other ones but maybe less on the graphical side.

Killzone is playing the safe way? Funny, I thought the market was saturated with military shooters. I guess now the tides have turned.



selnor1983 said:
@ Joe the bro

i cant quote on phone.

you do realise those screens are from static drawn images that are on loading screens don't you? None of those screens you posted are from any gameplay. Digital foundry, gamersyde and Dan greenwalt said its dynamic. In fact digital foundry said the dynamic lighting is technically outstanding. You can even see the dynamic lighting at work in the reflections of the cars your racing against. Theirs some forza 5 giffs going around from hood gameplay that looks like real life. Ive never seen reflections and lighting like that ever in a video game.

Can you provide some links? I know you are on your phone so if you can't right now it's fine.



Well then, I can't wait to play Ryse.



e=mc^2

Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)