Darc Requiem said:
Soriku said: Because it's on the 360, and most JRPG fans prefer Sony and Nintendo systems. |
Incorrect. Most JRPG "fans" are fanboys. Real fans of the genre, follow the genre. When Lost Odyssey launched on 360, it had the most JRPGs available. I know because I actually looked at the 360 release schedule before it launched. I saw the amount of JRPGs on the docket and bought one. Most JRPG "fans" ran out and bought PS3s and then trolled any JRPG title released on 360. Lost Odyssey included. It really got annoying. You'd go into a thread to discuss the game and there were a bunch of JRPG "fans" complaining about the game not being on PS3. It was pathetic.
Lost Odyssey was and is exceptional. Of course, if you tried to discuss after it's release. You got bombarded by these supposed JRPG fans that hadn't played the game telling you otherwise. These alleged fans also praised the greatnes of FFXIII even though it wasn't out. That was rather ironic given the way things turned out with that game.
Okay, mini-rant over. Sorry guys. Continue on. Maybe we can see a sequel to Lost Odyssey someday. Sakaguchi still has his magic. Lord knows Final Fantasy could use him again.
|
I was one of the people that bought a 360 ONLY for the JRPG support it's getting. I could give two shits about shooters no matter how amazing they are and most Western RPGs are multiplat / PC. When LO came out along with ToV, I even made a thread about how the 360 was so far my favorite console this generation because it supported my favorite genre.
What made me and many other jRPG fans (that didn't like shooters) angry was MS dropping support overnight and giving them the finger after buying a $300-480 console that it cost back then. I was, for one, really looking forward to Cry On, but I guess MW didn't turn Japan around like they expected. But I still think they should have gone through making that game not to piss off so many fans since it was on the roster before cutting off Mistwalker.
In the 2nd half of the generation, Sony and Nintendo has been where jRPGs have resided - and not MS. For that, I dont have any reason to get MS's next console. If there is an exclusive JRPG, I'll just borrow someone's since I'm sure every American and their grandmother will get a 720.
As for Lost Odyssey, I do consider it the "real" FF 13 this generation. Besides the loading times and a few technical issues, I really found it to be an enjoyable game. I didn't mind all the reading - because at one time you did have to read alot as a jRPG fan. Now we are in the "shoot everything and anyone that twitches" generation - so I can see why people don't want to read in games.
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials
Conservatives: Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.