By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Burnout Paradise... PS3 > 360

Kasz216 on 26 January 2008
ChronotriggerJM said:
Kasz216 said:
ChronotriggerJM said:
weezy said:
@chrono to sum it up...

more games + best online experience + better graphics(right now) + better controller = 3-6-0


More games: True

Best online experience: False (peer to peer 16 man matches does not equal 40 man dedicated servers), and 60 man on the horizon. Then games like Warhawks with HUGE maps, 32 players, and no lag? COD4 360 = 16 players, 24 players on PS3 version. But you guys have cross game chat, but either way this argument is moot.

Better Graphics: Opinionated, but by tech specs False.

Better Controller: Opinionated. :)

All of that totaled up together = whichever console the person prefers >_>


I've heard CoD4 lags like crazy on the PS3 online. Of course that's from Griffin, but he's not the kind of guy to make up bad stuff about the PS3.


I'm not really sure what kind of internet connection he's running, but in our household my roomate played with absolutely no lag, at various times in the day I might add. So it's true on my end ^^ my roomate with the 360 has had consistantly more lag than we've ever had :x peer to peer FTL ><


Must be.  When I get a PS3 i plan on picking it up just incase the guy i'm going to be living with stops paying for Xbox live.

Around the Network
VAMP on 26 January 2008

Just to clear things up, I think weezy was joking (I hope so at least) because I subscribe to EGM and they never said in their review that the 360 version is better.

 Also, Fight Night Round 3 is better on the PS3 (cleaner graphics and extra camera angle), NBA Live runs perfectly fine on the PS3, and whoever said CoD 4 lags on PS3 hasn't played it.



Mummelmann on 26 January 2008

This is the xact same thread as the "Is the PS3 more powerful than the 360" with the same arguments, the same folks arguing and the same ultimate end...
And what's the big deal about achievements?! I never got that.



Kasz216 on 26 January 2008
Mummelmann said:
This is the xact same thread as the "Is the PS3 more powerful than the 360" with the same arguments, the same folks arguing and the same ultimate end...
And what's the big deal about achievements?! I never got that.

 It lets people show off how "hardcore" they are.  Or some BS like that.



Mummelmann on 26 January 2008
Kasz216 said:
Mummelmann said:
This is the xact same thread as the "Is the PS3 more powerful than the 360" with the same arguments, the same folks arguing and the same ultimate end...
And what's the big deal about achievements?! I never got that.

It lets people show off how "hardcore" they are. Or some BS like that.


 Oh, ok. Well, some games have built in achievements as well (Timesplitters among others).



Around the Network
Morgyn on 26 January 2008

Put in 5 hours of Burnout Paradise last night.. its great ;D

I got the PS3 version, as did my friends.



TyePhoid_PAL on 26 January 2008

Everyone with a PS3 should forget bluetooth headsets. USB seems miles better. Once you first pair it to ur console you can just plug in whenever, also the sound quality is superior. 25 quid and you can use it for ur PC too.



Ynwa.

weezy on 26 January 2008

I also heard ps3 version of CoD4 lags online as well..

I think PSN needs a XBL type of internet service...



I am WEEzY. You can suck my Nintendo loving BALLS!

 

MynameisGARY

krik on 26 January 2008
weezy said:
I also heard ps3 version of CoD4 lags online as well..

I think PSN needs a XBL type of internet service...

 Actually it does not lag at all for me. It's even better than Warhawk (regarding lag, still like Warhawk online better). They did a good job with their servers and I have a pretty good internet connection.

 



PSN ID: krik

Optimistic predictions for 2008 (Feb 5 2008): Wii = 20M, PS3 = 14M, X360 = 9.5M

 

Morgyn on 27 January 2008

no lag at all for me either.