By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - If MS/Sony/Ninty Could Own One of its Competitors, Who Should Own What?

 

Who Should Own Who? (For the Best!)

Microsoft owns Nintendo 19 11.52%
 
Nintendo owns Microsoft 7 4.24%
 
Microsoft owns Sony 21 12.73%
 
Sony owns Microsoft 11 6.67%
 
Sony owns Nintendo 45 27.27%
 
Nintendo owns Sony 44 26.67%
 
Too much to Take In!!!!! 18 10.91%
 
Total:165

While I can't see any of these companies being bought out by the other, as a PC and console gamer, a Nintendo/Sony console would probably be the most desirable for me, due to their intellectual properties.

Even if Microsoft had the financial power to buy Nintendo, I just can't see Nintendo selling itself to a Western company (or any company, for that matter), especially when you consider how old the company is and how much it likes to go in its own direction.



Around the Network

MicroSony PS360



The problem with all of these options is that it would create "the ultimate gaming device" and would eliminate competition... Which would kill the gaming industry. Competition is a very healthy thing, keeps all gaming companies on their best feet forward, instead of being satisfied with their money stash.

I voted for Nintendo and Sony because I personally like Nintendo and Sony seems to be struggling financially right now. But in reality, I think it would be way too much for Microsoft to handle. Ninsony would dominate the Japanese gaming market, would have a pretty good foothold in Europe, and do well enough in America to make Microsoft panic. Sony would get all of the crazy HD ports that Nintendo is denied, so Microsoft would have to fall back onto its first party offerings. But it won't be enough to combat against Nintendo's first party and the ports. All those ports. Also, Microsoft has no handheld. Ninsony would make the ultimate handheld and it would be pure gamer gold.