S.T.A.G.E. said:
"Kotaku got Nintendo to admit in-game chatting on the Wii U would only work on "select games" includingAssassin's Creed III, Call of Duty Black Ops 2, andMass Effect. This gels with previous statements in which Nintendo hinted it would allow third-party publishers to implement their own online gameplay solutions, rather than locking them into a system-wide online solution. It's still a little disappointing that the company has removed any possibility of Xbox Live-style, cross-game party chat, or even casual voice conversations during single-player games."
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/10/nintendo-reveals-baffling-solution-for-wii-us-in-game-chat/
As I said, Nintendo is leaving it up to the third parties rather than having one sweeping online product for the consumers to enjoy. Iwata and Reggie need to make up their minds, because Iwata said Nintendo is not competing with the PS4 and 720 when they eventually come, and will not play their game but rather will focus on making something completely different. That is how they can survive. Reggie said different on CNN when he was boasting how the Wii U is more powerful than current gen consoles, which isnt saying much because next gen third party devs already know they are going to get slayed. I think the truth is somewhere between what Reggie and Iwata are both saying. They dont want to directly face the next Playstation and Xbox but they dont want their fans to depend on them for third party titles either. This is what I am gathering.I doubt they will be able to get all the third party titles they need to keep their fans away though. |
This post just reminds me how CONFUSED I am about Nintendo's online strategy.
BUT I still think Miiverse is a step in the right direction. Do I want more integration a la Live? Yes, but I think Nintendo did a surprisingly great job with Miiverse. I'd say it's pretty unique as far as social networking goes, which is an incredibly difficult thing to do.