F0X said:
Unfortunately, believeing that they exist in the same universe also means a giant gap or inconsistency in continuity. Remember the part in Ocarina of Time in which Link failed and Hyrule wasn't saved? I didn't. Because it didn't happen. The split timeline thing happened. That's perfectly acceptable. But since Link didn't fail in OoT's storyline, there's a plot inconsistency.
Unless, of course, the Zelda timeline is a multiverse. In that case, anything is possible. You could get a Game Over in Ocarina of Time and, oh, there's a branch universe created in which A Link to the Past takes place. If I could fix my problem with embedding videos, I have one that explains this idea rather well...
...nope. Okay, here's a link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1TSpfPFNlE
|
Yes. That is true.
It's anyone's guess really, and all open to interpretation. This is also the reason I'm not sure about the concensus these days that it was meant in the Hyrule Historia that 'Link is Defeated' timeline literaly means 'Link got killed'. It creates too many complications.
Personally, I think it should be read as 'Link is 'nullified', or, 'circumvented', or 'invalidated', or 'obstructed', or 'removed''... Yes, I whipped up the online thesaurus for this .
Anyway, by translating it differently than literaly 'got killed', suddenly the timeline is created by Link simply not being there. And not being there can have all kinds of causes. All we truly know is that for some reason, there was nobody to protect Hyrule from Ganon on one branch of the timeline, bringing the downfall of Hyrule.
I think, the "Downfall Timeline" is caused by Link journeying to the future for the first time. In that timeline, he is removed leaving no-one to protect them from Ganon. When at the end of the game Zelda sends Link back in time, this creates a 'new past', where Link lives as a child. Now you have three timelines, one with no Link (leading to ALttP-LoZ), one with Child Link (leading to MM-TP) and one where an Adult Link appears to save the day (leading to WW).
Ironically though, the timeline without a Link after OoT is the one that gets everlasting peace first, as it is made so in Zelda 2.
Complicated story, and I know it's not waterproof as you could easily say the timeline Link got removed from is the same as the one he wakes up in 7 years later. But his is all I got, because I don't want to believe in the 'easy way out', so to say.
But like I said, it's anyone's guess, your explanation is as good as mine .