Slimebeast said: It's just a pathetic mith that piracy benefits the gaming industry, Of course it doesn't Obviously you can cherry pick data and show that pirates on average buy games more often than the average internet user but that's only because most internet users don't play games. Any other conclusion is ridicilous. I have been a pirate for decades (since the Commodore 64 days) and I've followed the buying habits of dozens of real life individuals around me and the trend is crystal clear - the more you pirate the less you pay. These guys who pirate spend the money they saved from not buying games on other stuff - better PC hardware, sports, on a car, travels, the movies, pizza and hamburgers, beer, the bar. For some of these individuals the notion of paying for media is ridiculous. They feel it's awkward to pay for something that is commonly regarded as free. I know it's slightly different over there in the USA because you fear the coppers more but here in Europe no one is afraid of getting caught. |
Just because you and your freinds are of low morals and choose to not buy things doesn't mean much. For example me and my freinds who are gamers have all pirated and most still do, yet they all buy tonnes of games, movies, music etc. Circumstantial evidence is basically meaningless, even proper big studies can be completely wrong even if they are not designed to decive.
And if what you describe was true then rampent movie piracy would be killing the movie industry , especially with their claimed billions in losses due to piracy yet
Of course that is mainly thanks to rapidly increasing ticket prices
But I am sure they are only increasing ticket prices to make up for the lower turnout numbers are due to piracy right?
(OMG Piracy is killing clothing sales and boosting media and sporting equipment! Wait that makes no sense does it?)
Of course this is all meaningless as the are hundreds of factors at work so no study, trend of graph will ever be able to prove any impact of any factor because nothing is in isolation, not to mention the fact that data is all up for interpretation. So in other words this argument is pointless
for another example
most would say that it shows piracy killing Recorded music (CDs), some would say that it shows that the availability of didital distrabution directly correlates to the drop in CD sales but doesn't provide as much revenue as prices are lower and you can easilly buy any single song without buying an album even songs not traditionally released a singles, yet others would say piracy (kicking off in the early 2000s) lead to a boost in live revenue. I would say it's irralivent as the industry as a whole is doing better than ever so no matter what factors are at work they are clearly not killing the industry.
@TheVoxelman on twitter