Am i the only one that was disappointed that "Final Fantasy VII: Crisis Core" was not in it???
Am i the only one that was disappointed that "Final Fantasy VII: Crisis Core" was not in it???
You know MGS4 is meant to be beatable in under 5 hours to get Big Boss title. Almost all MGS games is like this, it is no surprise. Unless 90% of complainers miss this fact or they suck at it and can't beat the game in its most extreme difficulty, including getting caught by enemies, running and gunning, and use more than 1 ration... You'll never be like Big Boss.
Jay520 said: Obviously, that's all your opinion. I had some of the most fun this generation playing NSMBWii with some frineds. And don't all console makers rely on fanboys.
|
X360/PS3 don't rely on fanboys.The produces kickass hardcore games like Ucharted,Killzone,Infamous,God of War,Motorstrom,Resistance,Halo,Gears of War,Forza Motorsport 3.And I the fact that all Mario games are fun make them games who deserves 90+ scores.Hell Green Lantern is also fun why don't we give 9 0f 10.... People complain about CALL OF DUTY being ovverated(the shit all over IGN review say if was Black Ops it would have gotten 10/10,Black Ops got 8.5 from IGN :P)but I feel that every game that has Mario and Zelda gets and ovverated score,cause of nostalgia.They are good games,but in no way 90+ games.Super Mario Galaxy 2 got 97 on Metacritic.By that logic it should have been Game of the Year from 2010.Mass Effect 2 and Red Dead Redemption had 96 and 95 respectably and they received 90% of the GOTY awards.
germibobi said:
X360/PS3 don't rely on fanboys.The produces kickass hardcore games like Ucharted,Killzone,Infamous,God of War,Motorstrom,Resistance,Halo,Gears of War,Forza Motorsport 3.And I the fact that all Mario games are fun make them games who deserves 90+ scores.Hell Green Lantern is also fun why don't we give 9 0f 10.... People complain about CALL OF DUTY being ovverated(the shit all over IGN review say if was Black Ops it would have gotten 10/10,Black Ops got 8.5 from IGN :P)but I feel that every game that has Mario and Zelda gets and ovverated score,cause of nostalgia.They are good games,but in no way 90+ games.Super Mario Galaxy 2 got 97 on Metacritic.By that logic it should have been Game of the Year from 2010.Mass Effect 2 and Red Dead Redemption had 96 and 95 respectably and they received 90% of the GOTY awards. |
I don't know what you're point is, but I and millions of others have actually had "fun" with a lo tof Nintendo games this gen. You can go compare metacritic numbers and GOTY awards, I don't care about all of that. I just play a game and enjoy it.
germibobi said:
Still they have too Super Mario Bros games which don't deserve this at all.They are just remastered old NSES games.Nitendo sucks this gen and please don't tell blah blah Nitendo was the best back in 80s and 90s.Yeah they had amazing games on the NES/SNES and were hands down the best then.But now they make shitty games and rely on santimental fanboys. |
You claim Nintendo rely on 'sentimental fanboys'. However, the Wii and DS have far outsold their predecessors. This suggests that Nintendo attracted many new customers, rather than just relying on those who owned a NES or SNES as you imply. Hell, even if every single person who owned a GB or NES (What were Nintendo's top selling handhelds and home consoles respectively before this gen) bought a DS and Wii, there would still be sales unaccounted for.
Seriously, just STFU. It's for your own good.
@germibobi
I personally thought Super Mario Galaxy 1/2 were one of the best games this generation. Not much of a fan of New Super Mario Bros. Wii though.
It's just different opinions. You don't like them, that's fine. But you don't have to "prove" your opinion with reviews and GotY awards.
Xxain said: Standards change maybe? What was a "Best Game Ever" in 2008 probably isnt in 2011. Just a Thought ( not that im saying MGS4 didnt deserve it) |
Or, when it was reviewed it was one guy or department. While a list like this is everybody.
Or it's just a forgetable game when all is said in done.
Kasz216 said:
Or, when it was reviewed it was one guy or department. While a list like this is everybody. |
Thank you!!! It seems some of them have a hard time understanding this.
I gave up on IGN as soon as they rated GT5 an 8.5. There review of the game was complete BS! Then they gave Killzone 3 (my favouitre fps) an 8.5 as well. And they gave Infamous 2 a 9/10... They really screwed it up for me earlier so I'm not surprised
dsage01 said: I gave up on IGN as soon as they rated GT5 an 8.5. There review of the game was complete BS! Then they gave Killzone 3 (my favouitre fps) an 8.5 as well. And they gave Infamous 2 a 9/10... They really screwed it up for me earlier so I'm not surprised |
Those are excellent scores though. However, I do agree that IGN's GT5 review was not very informative (The reviewer should be blamed, not the whole site).