By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - gt5 user score sabotage on metacritic

Doobie_wop said:
Killiana1a said:
Ping_ii said:
Killiana1a said:

A cruel bit of karma here :) Was bound to happen because the way PS3 users hyped it on all video game site forums and message boards.

Or as the Newton's Third Law of Motion states:

To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction

 Did individuals think there would be no blowback for hyping this game as the second coming of Jesus Christ and 2nd coming for the PS3? Well, metacritic and those "0" scores are the equal and opposite reaction to it.

Don't get mad at me, just stating the stone cold, sober obvious.

Much like how 360 fans hyped Alan wake as the new console graphics king ,GOTY 2011,Uncharted graphic killer???

You make it sound like PS3 fans are the only ones deserving backlash for UBER HYPING stuff when 360 fans are just as bad if not more infamous in this department.

Don't get mad at me just stating stone cold sober obvious

PS3 users are more ubiquitous and vocal than 36 0 users. It is a general trend I see from VGChartz, to Gamespot, to IGN, and on.

I don't recall the Alan Wake hype because I was too busy buying Red Dead Redemption.

Neither side is innocent, yet it appears to me that PS3 users are off their proverbial hinges this generation, while Nintendo users are the most polite and respectful. 360 users fall somewhere in between with a tad more devious nature because we know exactly what buttons to push to get emotional screeds.

Whereas toying around in the Nintendo forums will garner a beat-down, logical "lets look at the top 20 best selling games of this gen" reaction; toying around in the Sony forums produces enough emotion to make Clint Eastwood cry.

You obviously haven't been roaming around the Internet enough if you've come to that conclusion. 360 fanboys basically took over every game related site from 2006 to 2008 and they continue to be a nuisance even today. You've just overlooked those fanboys because you have a bias towards a certain console and you agree with many of the things those fanboys may say, the difference is that your both polite and smart enough to keep most of your negativity to yourself. I can level that same accusation to any Nintendo or Sony appreciator. But when someone claims that one group of idiots is worse than another, then it makes you look a little silly. 

It's so weird  how people forget the Oblivion, Bioshock and Mass Effect 2 reactions that came up when they went multi-platform, but they are quick to bring up the Final Fantasy reaction. It's weird how people bring up how Killzone 2, GT5, MGS4 and Little Big Planet are over hyped, but for some reason they forget the hype that came before Halo 3, Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Too Human and Kinect.

Nintendo fans are also far from civil, they just don't have the forum userbase to make as big of an impact. They trash nearly every website when a low review is given, they have some weird hate for analyst and they would defend anything Nintendo did, even if the company clearly made a mistake.

Don't be the guy who always points fingers at specific groups, without taking the actions of every other group into consideration. 360 fan boys have been just as bad in the past and just because you turn a blind eye towards them, it doesn't mean that you can point the finger at someone else.

Accusation of bias. I have stated this before, between the NES, SNES, N64, PS1, and PS2 I have spent over 20 years gaming on Sony and Nintendo consoles alone. I never owned an Xbox and I just picked up my 360 two years ago. To say I have bias when I am just pointing out the obvious of Gran Turismo 5 being hyped to unheard levels is quite absurd in my opinion.

Concerning Oblivion, Bioshock and Mass Effect 2, the vitriol is well justified. How many Metal Gear Solid, Gran Turismo, God of War, and Uncharted games have 360 owners been able to play on their 360? Zero zlich none. A one way street, but life is not fair and publishers want to make money.

As for the hype on any game, be it 360, PS3 or Wii, hype is hype and it needs a response, eventhough many dedicated users of the particular game willl scream flame or bias. When Gears of War 3 comes close to release, I will be in those threads trying my best to even out the hype with honest feedback.

I don't take responsibility for what other console users write to inflame the console wars debate. The expectation for each critic of a particular game to treat all games the same is unfair and unrealistic. This is the same expectation leveled at journalism where we expect all journalists to be robots reporting the facts, while we deny that their personal beliefs, political leaning, and upbringing has a far greater influence on their reporting of an event. Even with a code of journalistic ethics where each journalist was inculcated to follow it like dogma there would still be bias to the extent where we would still have right leaning news, left leaning news, and left leaning news parading around as moderate.

We all have a set of eyes with which we view the world greatly influenced by our upbringing, personal beliefs, and political views. Adherence to some sort of code of fairness would still not blunt this to the effect where each opinion on an issue is fair. Our "view" would still leak out causing others to accuse bias.

For this reason, I see no point in parading around and trying my best to be "fair." Fairness would mean no personal beliefs, upbringing, or political views. Hell, even robots could not be "fair" because the codes they run off of would still include the biases of the creator of their codes in the way they would react to complex situations requiring more than just moving a limb up or down.



Around the Network

@zgamer5 

"how many hours did you play the game? the game isnt perfect, but just because it took them 5 years it shoudnt be. did you play b spec mode?  did you play the endurance race on le mans? to review a game the size of gt5 correctly people shoudnt use hype to base their review on, and should play it alteast for more then 30 hours, those are two things you didnt do."

 

So far i have played 10 hours of the game. I haven't played the b spec mode but have played the endurance race on le mans. I never based my reviews on hype. I base my review on the time i spent with the game.  The first time i got to play game was at a gaming convention in NZ called armageddon. I am big fan of the GT series and have played every GT game that has been released thus far. So far GT5 is disappointment compared to its predecessor. It seems to me that PD went for Quantity rather than Quality which i think was their downfall with this game. 



dane007 said:

@zgamer5 

"how many hours did you play the game? the game isnt perfect, but just because it took them 5 years it shoudnt be. did you play b spec mode?  did you play the endurance race on le mans? to review a game the size of gt5 correctly people shoudnt use hype to base their review on, and should play it alteast for more then 30 hours, those are two things you didnt do."

 

So far i have played 10 hours of the game. I haven't played the b spec mode but have played the endurance race on le mans. I never based my reviews on hype. I base my review on the time i spent with the game.  The first time i got to play game was at a gaming convention in NZ called armageddon. I am big fan of the GT series and have played every GT game that has been released thus far. So far GT5 is disappointment compared to its predecessor. It seems to me that PD went for Quantity rather than Quality which i think was their downfall with this game. 

only 10hrs you fail!!!



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1