By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Should EA surrender the War FPS genre to Activision?

 

Should EA surrender the War FPS genre to Activision?

Yes , kill Medal Of Honour 22 27.50%
 
No, don't give in fight CoD 58 72.50%
 
Total:80

No they shouldn't surrender the genre, but they should get someone besides DICE to make Medal of Honor 2.

I have no idea why EA would have 2 separate modern war FPS games (MoH and BF) and have them be made by the same developer. Honestly I can't tell the difference between Bad Company 2 and Medal of Honor, they look the exact same.

Keep making DICE do Battlefield games and get someone else to do Medal of Honors so they don't look and play the same.



Around the Network

A monopoly in any market, no matter how small, leads to stagnation.  Could you imagine what CoD would become if it had no competition?



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."

Yes they should, or at least they should try to make something different with their shooters, make them more hardcore and niche. Because nothing can touch Call of Duty. It's already a legend.



tuscaniman said:

MoH sucks so they should bury that but I'm pretty sure the newly formed Respawn Entertainment, formerly Infinity Ward will have something to say for it. Also Battlefield:BC3 will be their true war shooter. There was no need for MoH in the first place. It was a rushed product that they wanted to push out to contend with COD this year to make some money.

I think you mean just "Battlefield 3". BC3 doesn't exist...yet.

OT: I think Respawn Entertainment should have a shot at the MoH series.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

I think that MoH is Amazing. It is an amazing value for the PS3 version. The only real thing i don't like is that they used the UE3 for the single player and it doesn't work well at times.



Around the Network

No they shouldn't, the only reason Call of Duty has become successful is because ever since Modern Warfare, every 8 year old and his friend have bought it.

Call of Duty died after Modern Warfare.



Smart Men answer questions, Wise men ask questions.
Gamers play games, True Gamers support Gaming

no competition fosters innovation



I have lost faith in DICE, the battlefield franchise by far take 10 million dumps on that piece of shit call of duty, only people that think otherwise are noobs, new gamers and dumbasses.

however bad company 2 was a fucking abomination compared to the rest of the battlefield franchise and and medal of honor mulitplayer is just *facepalm* I know DICE is better than that, so I do hope they get rid of their hard-on for call of duty and infinity ward come time for battlefield 3 but I'm not holding my breath.......



BF3 will crush COD next year because with infinity ward in tatters and Treyarch's next game not for 2 years after BF3 will destroy next years cod simply because PC fans will go nuts, BF2 was MASSIVE and BF3 will be the same HUGE blocking out COD. Activison will panic thats cod is dead and the year after sell millions with another treyarch shooter. 



Of Course That's Just My Opinion, I Could Be Wrong

Ajescent said:

People give up too easily, the game isn't even out in the uk yet (I don't think) and already people are calling for them to shut up shop? Jesus...

ya it out it was released on friday