By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sony says sorry for other os take down

Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:

It was in the best intrests of the majority to remove a feature the majority never used and therefore were never at risk of anything... by screwing over a minority of people who used this and who are the only people effected.

Yeah... ok Sony.

People who think Sony doing this is a positve need a major reality check.

Hell this isn't even going to slow down piracy, if anything it will probably lead to a piracy solution quicker because Sony decided to anatagonize people who use Linux on the PS3... aka hackers... and also basically threw down a gauntlet to a bunch of other people.

Hardly matters.

First, there are no PS3s being produced that run Linux.

Second, the vast majority of owners who have an older PS3 will simply update the firmware with no regard for the loss of Linux as they, like the vast majority of PS3 owners, had no intention of ever installing Linux.

Add to these the older PS3s that are no longer working.

Ultimately, you're left with a shrinking number of consoles that are capable of having a hardware hack installed on an older console that can run Linux.

Net result: it makes a slightly larger niche market for old PS3s among the small community of users determined to play pirated games.

When found, this solution does nothing for the vast majority of PS3 owners who don't have an older PS3, aren't running Linux, don't have the hardware modifications made to their console and of course the simplest part of playing pirated games: don't have a PC with a BD burner and a stack of BD media.

You're left with a pretty insignificant number of potential pirates who have to leap through quite a few hoops just to play pirated games.

So someone gets a working solution to play pirated games on a software and hardware hacked PS3. Congrats. Really; congrats. It will have taken almost four years. The only benefit for the general public wlll be the inevitable Youtube videos displaying the achievement since it won't help all but a tiny niche of people who are very dedicated to playing pirated games.

SCE isn't concerned with this tiny niche of people that will go through more trouble than it's worth simply because they can.

They're concerned with general piracy among regular consumers who wouldn't have to do anything more than pay their local hardware hacker $50 to install a mod chip and supply them with $10 burned games.

Actually no.  I mean people will work to find a way to hack the actual PS3.  Or even find a way to reset and/or customize the firmware like PSP.


So instead of only old phat systems being able to pirate for the small amount of people who want to find an old PS3 to pirate... they open it up to where every PS3 may end up being pirateable.

Other OS was actually a good diversion to keep the hackers on.

and yet that was not good enough for some hacker's!

the problem is Sony is being viewed as the Bad guy here and they are trying to protect consumer's

you may not think so but with security professional's stating something like this that Even salted encryption may not be enough :

PCI

December 11, 2007

Hashing Credit Card Numbers: Revisited Again

I recently had to revisit the estimates I provided in our white paper on brute forcing credit card hashes since new techniques were published that can speed the brute forcing up by at least a factor of 5 using off-the-shelf video cards.  Well, a month later I am having to revise the estimates again.  Nick Breese of New Zealand has published a paper at Kiwicon on using a PlayStation 3 to crack hashes.  His estimates are about 1.4 billion hashes per second for MD5.  Our proof of concept code running at about 2 million hashes per second seems kind of slow now.  Probably at least 2 billion hashes per second is feasible in the near future with readily available hardware and source code.

Storing credit cards using a simple single pass of a hash algorithm, even when salted, is fool-hardy.  It is just too easy to brute force the credit card numbers if the hashes are compromised.  Based on the potential value of the card numbers, there is more than enough financial incentive to buy a $500 PlayStation 3 and develop a little code.

When hashing credit card number, the hashing must be carefully designed to protect against brute forcing by using strongest available cryptographic hash functions, large salt values, and multiple iterations.
you know it's just not about only the PSN outside of PSN there is a whole lot of other web site's with encryption.
Geohot making his hack now known with instruction's on how to do it, has not only hurt ps3 gamer's and people who use the PS3 but may of infact damage other's on the web. Sony removing the Install Other OS on the ps3 with firmware update 3.21 was a precaution they would not want to be liable for.


I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Around the Network
joeorc said:
Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:

It was in the best intrests of the majority to remove a feature the majority never used and therefore were never at risk of anything... by screwing over a minority of people who used this and who are the only people effected.

Yeah... ok Sony.

People who think Sony doing this is a positve need a major reality check.

Hell this isn't even going to slow down piracy, if anything it will probably lead to a piracy solution quicker because Sony decided to anatagonize people who use Linux on the PS3... aka hackers... and also basically threw down a gauntlet to a bunch of other people.

Hardly matters.

First, there are no PS3s being produced that run Linux.

Second, the vast majority of owners who have an older PS3 will simply update the firmware with no regard for the loss of Linux as they, like the vast majority of PS3 owners, had no intention of ever installing Linux.

Add to these the older PS3s that are no longer working.

Ultimately, you're left with a shrinking number of consoles that are capable of having a hardware hack installed on an older console that can run Linux.

Net result: it makes a slightly larger niche market for old PS3s among the small community of users determined to play pirated games.

When found, this solution does nothing for the vast majority of PS3 owners who don't have an older PS3, aren't running Linux, don't have the hardware modifications made to their console and of course the simplest part of playing pirated games: don't have a PC with a BD burner and a stack of BD media.

You're left with a pretty insignificant number of potential pirates who have to leap through quite a few hoops just to play pirated games.

So someone gets a working solution to play pirated games on a software and hardware hacked PS3. Congrats. Really; congrats. It will have taken almost four years. The only benefit for the general public wlll be the inevitable Youtube videos displaying the achievement since it won't help all but a tiny niche of people who are very dedicated to playing pirated games.

SCE isn't concerned with this tiny niche of people that will go through more trouble than it's worth simply because they can.

They're concerned with general piracy among regular consumers who wouldn't have to do anything more than pay their local hardware hacker $50 to install a mod chip and supply them with $10 burned games.

Actually no.  I mean people will work to find a way to hack the actual PS3.  Or even find a way to reset and/or customize the firmware like PSP.


So instead of only old phat systems being able to pirate for the small amount of people who want to find an old PS3 to pirate... they open it up to where every PS3 may end up being pirateable.

Other OS was actually a good diversion to keep the hackers on.

and yet that was not good enough for some hacker's!

the problem is Sony is being viewed as the Bad guy here and they are trying to protect consumer's

you may not think so but with security professional's stating something like this that Even salted encryption may not be enough :

PCI

December 11, 2007

Hashing Credit Card Numbers: Revisited Again

I recently had to revisit the estimates I provided in our white paper on brute forcing credit card hashes since new techniques were published that can speed the brute forcing up by at least a factor of 5 using off-the-shelf video cards.  Well, a month later I am having to revise the estimates again.  Nick Breese of New Zealand has published a paper at Kiwicon on using a PlayStation 3 to crack hashes.  His estimates are about 1.4 billion hashes per second for MD5.  Our proof of concept code running at about 2 million hashes per second seems kind of slow now.  Probably at least 2 billion hashes per second is feasible in the near future with readily available hardware and source code.

Storing credit cards using a simple single pass of a hash algorithm, even when salted, is fool-hardy.  It is just too easy to brute force the credit card numbers if the hashes are compromised.  Based on the potential value of the card numbers, there is more than enough financial incentive to buy a $500 PlayStation 3 and develop a little code.

When hashing credit card number, the hashing must be carefully designed to protect against brute forcing by using strongest available cryptographic hash functions, large salt values, and multiple iterations.
you know it's just not about only the PSN outside of PSN there is a whole lot of other web site's with encryption.
Geohot making his hack know has not only hurt ps3 gamer's and people who use the PS3 but may of infact damage other's on the web. Sony removing the Install Other OS on the ps3 with firmware update 3.21 was a precaution they would not want to be liable for.

That's because... Sony IS the bad guy hear.

One of two.  Both Sony and the Hackers are bad guys.

The good guys are the innocent people who use Other OS who are being screwed.

I could care less about one guy doing a bad thing to get another bad guy if it leads to the innocent being hurt.

Also you know... you think the people who use the PS3 for credit card hashing are going to update their firmware?  They'll just buy a slim with all their money.



Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
huh I am chilled, lol, I am backing up Sony here they said sorry and explained it is for the greater good, I thought it would be better if a sony fan posted this instead of just a random person, lol

So all it takes is for someone to claim something "is for the greater good" and your fine with it.  Nevermind Sony said it was for security reasons only.

They've never once actually mentioned piracy to my knowledge.  So, how is this for the greater good for removing it because of security issues... that the majority won't ever expierence because they won't even use it?

Not to mention... security problems with Linux on the cell?  Is there even a MORE obscure thing to design a security exploit for?  If they don't bother with Apple why would they bother with this?

Unfortuantely I know so much more about this than you think, GeoHotz went to alot of trouble just to get this far, after thinking about it really it would not surprise me how much futher hackers would be willing to go, do not under-estimate them

I do not just believe Sony, I know alot of things, unfortunately, I am a programmer I can program in c#, c++, Java, Visual Basic and Assembly language, I could develop some nasty applications if I put my mind to it, but I am not like that.

Believe sony... about what?  Once again, this security issue doesn't effect ANYBODY who doesn't have other OS installed?  Yes?

So... uh... what's your greater good? 

Stopping the phat PS3's from pirating?  That's not the greater good... that's Sony having left a door wide open that they should of known would of been a probelm when they were designing it.  Period.

They didn't they put it in.  I feel sorry for Sony, but it's wrong of them to remove a feature they sold the product with.

right you do know developing HD games cost a lot of money, it is hard for a deveoper to make a profit in recent times, hence the reason why alot of them are going multi, now stop being silly please, this is for the greater good, piracy is bad.

Finally if you enable piracy on the ps3 via custom firmware I am betting you will have to overide it's security features, this will leave the door open to attacks such as stealing personal information, I am sorry but I think you are living in pixie land if you think people will not try and take advantage of newer abilities on PS3

People don't bother on Linux or Apple... why woud they bother on PS3... also... if pirates get their information stolen by hackers, fuck them they're pirates.

As for the "HD games cost a lot of money"  Sony should of thought of that before they put other OS in to begin with... not to mention there aren't THAT many phat PS3's out there where it should make a difference.  Let alone phat PS3's belonging to people who are going to want to pirate.

People who pirate a lot tend to not buy a system until the way to pirate has been created since you know... they don't want to pay for games.

 

The end result would be a small amount of hackers buying up old PS3s.  Hardly catastrophic... and even if it was... it's Sony's fault to begin with.

yeah right, that's so right George Hotz didn't bother with PS3, it wasn't really hacked, it's all Sony's fault / sarcasm

you are contradicting yourself because you are mad at Sony, it's funny how everyone is jumping on the hate wagon now the feature is gone, this reminds me of BC compatibility back in 2007, all of them hypocrites, never bought a ps3 with BC then when sony removed it to make it cheaper, so you all could afford it, the irony :(:(



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
huh I am chilled, lol, I am backing up Sony here they said sorry and explained it is for the greater good, I thought it would be better if a sony fan posted this instead of just a random person, lol

So all it takes is for someone to claim something "is for the greater good" and your fine with it.  Nevermind Sony said it was for security reasons only.

They've never once actually mentioned piracy to my knowledge.  So, how is this for the greater good for removing it because of security issues... that the majority won't ever expierence because they won't even use it?

Not to mention... security problems with Linux on the cell?  Is there even a MORE obscure thing to design a security exploit for?  If they don't bother with Apple why would they bother with this?

Unfortuantely I know so much more about this than you think, GeoHotz went to alot of trouble just to get this far, after thinking about it really it would not surprise me how much futher hackers would be willing to go, do not under-estimate them

I do not just believe Sony, I know alot of things, unfortunately, I am a programmer I can program in c#, c++, Java, Visual Basic and Assembly language, I could develop some nasty applications if I put my mind to it, but I am not like that.

Believe sony... about what?  Once again, this security issue doesn't effect ANYBODY who doesn't have other OS installed?  Yes?

So... uh... what's your greater good? 

Stopping the phat PS3's from pirating?  That's not the greater good... that's Sony having left a door wide open that they should of known would of been a probelm when they were designing it.  Period.

They didn't they put it in.  I feel sorry for Sony, but it's wrong of them to remove a feature they sold the product with.

right you do know developing HD games cost a lot of money, it is hard for a deveoper to make a profit in recent times, hence the reason why alot of them are going multi, now stop being silly please, this is for the greater good, piracy is bad.

Finally if you enable piracy on the ps3 via custom firmware I am betting you will have to overide it's security features, this will leave the door open to attacks such as stealing personal information, I am sorry but I think you are living in pixie land if you think people will not try and take advantage of newer abilities on PS3

People don't bother on Linux or Apple... why woud they bother on PS3... also... if pirates get their information stolen by hackers, fuck them they're pirates.

As for the "HD games cost a lot of money"  Sony should of thought of that before they put other OS in to begin with... not to mention there aren't THAT many phat PS3's out there where it should make a difference.  Let alone phat PS3's belonging to people who are going to want to pirate.

People who pirate a lot tend to not buy a system until the way to pirate has been created since you know... they don't want to pay for games.

 

The end result would be a small amount of hackers buying up old PS3s.  Hardly catastrophic... and even if it was... it's Sony's fault to begin with.

yeah right, that's so right George Hotz didn't bother with PS3, it wasn't really hacked, it's all Sony's fault / sarcasm

you are contradicting yourself because you are mad at Sony, it's funny how everyone is jumping on the hate wagon now the feature is gone, this reminds me of BC compatibility back in 2007, all of them hypocrites, never bought a ps3 with BC then when sony removed it to make it cheaper, so you all could afford it, the irony :(:(

Did George Hotz hack the PS3 so it downloads viruses on other peoples PS3s?  Because if not... this doesn't "help the majority of playstation owners".

Sony's conetention was that this caused security issues for the majority of people.  Which you know... it doesn't.

Only those who download other OS in the first place... and who WANT the feature there.

 

Sony removed the feature for one reason it was good for SONY.  They took a feature away from people who use it, that people paid for, soley for their own bottom line.  Period

That's reprehensible.  I don't care if it's only 1 person who legitamitly used Other OS.



I think Sony should refund Amazon.

Of all the things that could happen to the PS3, Amazon no longer selling it the only real worse case scenario.

Needless to say, Amazon is a better company than Sony with more focus on customer service and this is proven time and time again.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
ZenfoldorVGI said:
I think Sony should refund Amazon.

Of all the things that could happen to the PS3, Amazon no longer selling it the only real worse case scenario.

Needless to say, Amazon is a better company than Sony with more focus on customer service and this is proven time and time again.

Actually, Amazon have the structure set up in place for a digital distribution network. Don't be suprised if we see them moving into movie rental, or even becoming an online game publisher, similar to Steam.



Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
huh I am chilled, lol, I am backing up Sony here they said sorry and explained it is for the greater good, I thought it would be better if a sony fan posted this instead of just a random person, lol

So all it takes is for someone to claim something "is for the greater good" and your fine with it.  Nevermind Sony said it was for security reasons only.

They've never once actually mentioned piracy to my knowledge.  So, how is this for the greater good for removing it because of security issues... that the majority won't ever expierence because they won't even use it?

Not to mention... security problems with Linux on the cell?  Is there even a MORE obscure thing to design a security exploit for?  If they don't bother with Apple why would they bother with this?

Unfortuantely I know so much more about this than you think, GeoHotz went to alot of trouble just to get this far, after thinking about it really it would not surprise me how much futher hackers would be willing to go, do not under-estimate them

I do not just believe Sony, I know alot of things, unfortunately, I am a programmer I can program in c#, c++, Java, Visual Basic and Assembly language, I could develop some nasty applications if I put my mind to it, but I am not like that.

Believe sony... about what?  Once again, this security issue doesn't effect ANYBODY who doesn't have other OS installed?  Yes?

So... uh... what's your greater good? 

Stopping the phat PS3's from pirating?  That's not the greater good... that's Sony having left a door wide open that they should of known would of been a probelm when they were designing it.  Period.

They didn't they put it in.  I feel sorry for Sony, but it's wrong of them to remove a feature they sold the product with.

right you do know developing HD games cost a lot of money, it is hard for a deveoper to make a profit in recent times, hence the reason why alot of them are going multi, now stop being silly please, this is for the greater good, piracy is bad.

Finally if you enable piracy on the ps3 via custom firmware I am betting you will have to overide it's security features, this will leave the door open to attacks such as stealing personal information, I am sorry but I think you are living in pixie land if you think people will not try and take advantage of newer abilities on PS3

People don't bother on Linux or Apple... why woud they bother on PS3... also... if pirates get their information stolen by hackers, fuck them they're pirates.

As for the "HD games cost a lot of money"  Sony should of thought of that before they put other OS in to begin with... not to mention there aren't THAT many phat PS3's out there where it should make a difference.  Let alone phat PS3's belonging to people who are going to want to pirate.

People who pirate a lot tend to not buy a system until the way to pirate has been created since you know... they don't want to pay for games.

 

The end result would be a small amount of hackers buying up old PS3s.  Hardly catastrophic... and even if it was... it's Sony's fault to begin with.

yeah right, that's so right George Hotz didn't bother with PS3, it wasn't really hacked, it's all Sony's fault / sarcasm

you are contradicting yourself because you are mad at Sony, it's funny how everyone is jumping on the hate wagon now the feature is gone, this reminds me of BC compatibility back in 2007, all of them hypocrites, never bought a ps3 with BC then when sony removed it to make it cheaper, so you all could afford it, the irony :(:(

Did George Hotz hack the PS3 so it downloads viruses on other peoples PS3s?  Because if not... this doesn't "help the majority of playstation owners".

Sony's conetention was that this caused security issues for the majority of people.  Which you know... it doesn't.

Only those who download other OS in the first place... and who WANT the feature there.

 

Sony removed the feature for one reason it was good for SONY.  They took a feature away from people who use it, that people paid for, soley for their own bottom line.

That's reprehensible.

so you think it's wrong to protect people who may want to have custom firmware from things like viruses and spyware etc as well?? Anyway any pirates should be banned, if you want to keep other os it is optional, seriously you have spun this way out of context if you are that bothered about linux either do the following:

A. get a cheap pc that runs linux

B. keep other os and buy a ps3 slim(if you are bothered about gaming as well).

I am sure if you get some money back it will help you out either way. I admit it is not the fairest solution, but seriously, I do understand why they are doing this!!



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
Kasz216 said:
jneul said:
huh I am chilled, lol, I am backing up Sony here they said sorry and explained it is for the greater good, I thought it would be better if a sony fan posted this instead of just a random person, lol

So all it takes is for someone to claim something "is for the greater good" and your fine with it.  Nevermind Sony said it was for security reasons only.

They've never once actually mentioned piracy to my knowledge.  So, how is this for the greater good for removing it because of security issues... that the majority won't ever expierence because they won't even use it?

Not to mention... security problems with Linux on the cell?  Is there even a MORE obscure thing to design a security exploit for?  If they don't bother with Apple why would they bother with this?

Unfortuantely I know so much more about this than you think, GeoHotz went to alot of trouble just to get this far, after thinking about it really it would not surprise me how much futher hackers would be willing to go, do not under-estimate them

I do not just believe Sony, I know alot of things, unfortunately, I am a programmer I can program in c#, c++, Java, Visual Basic and Assembly language, I could develop some nasty applications if I put my mind to it, but I am not like that.

Believe sony... about what?  Once again, this security issue doesn't effect ANYBODY who doesn't have other OS installed?  Yes?

So... uh... what's your greater good? 

Stopping the phat PS3's from pirating?  That's not the greater good... that's Sony having left a door wide open that they should of known would of been a probelm when they were designing it.  Period.

They didn't they put it in.  I feel sorry for Sony, but it's wrong of them to remove a feature they sold the product with.

right you do know developing HD games cost a lot of money, it is hard for a deveoper to make a profit in recent times, hence the reason why alot of them are going multi, now stop being silly please, this is for the greater good, piracy is bad.

Finally if you enable piracy on the ps3 via custom firmware I am betting you will have to overide it's security features, this will leave the door open to attacks such as stealing personal information, I am sorry but I think you are living in pixie land if you think people will not try and take advantage of newer abilities on PS3

People don't bother on Linux or Apple... why woud they bother on PS3... also... if pirates get their information stolen by hackers, fuck them they're pirates.

As for the "HD games cost a lot of money"  Sony should of thought of that before they put other OS in to begin with... not to mention there aren't THAT many phat PS3's out there where it should make a difference.  Let alone phat PS3's belonging to people who are going to want to pirate.

People who pirate a lot tend to not buy a system until the way to pirate has been created since you know... they don't want to pay for games.

 

The end result would be a small amount of hackers buying up old PS3s.  Hardly catastrophic... and even if it was... it's Sony's fault to begin with.

yeah right, that's so right George Hotz didn't bother with PS3, it wasn't really hacked, it's all Sony's fault / sarcasm

you are contradicting yourself because you are mad at Sony, it's funny how everyone is jumping on the hate wagon now the feature is gone, this reminds me of BC compatibility back in 2007, all of them hypocrites, never bought a ps3 with BC then when sony removed it to make it cheaper, so you all could afford it, the irony :(:(

Did George Hotz hack the PS3 so it downloads viruses on other peoples PS3s?  Because if not... this doesn't "help the majority of playstation owners".

Sony's conetention was that this caused security issues for the majority of people.  Which you know... it doesn't.

Only those who download other OS in the first place... and who WANT the feature there.

 

Sony removed the feature for one reason it was good for SONY.  They took a feature away from people who use it, that people paid for, soley for their own bottom line.  Period

That's reprehensible.  I don't care if it's only 1 person who legitamitly used Other OS.

Opinion noted without proof.

did your PS3 come preinstalled with linux?

How do you get into Linux, you have to go through the XMB! on the PS3 as people seem to overlook they did not remove Linux they removed "install other OS function" out of the XMB which is not owned by the consumer it's owned by Sony. and you would have to agree to the EULA of the XMB inorder to even use Linux.

thus just because you bought the system does not mean you have claim's to it's software. you are givin a license to use the software not try to bypass it's security and encryption. which because of Hacker's Sony has taken that step of prevention which is what a prudent man would do.

ever hear of the prudent man rule?

while I do not like what Sony has done, I understand why they did do it.

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:

It was in the best intrests of the majority to remove a feature the majority never used and therefore were never at risk of anything... by screwing over a minority of people who used this and who are the only people effected.

Yeah... ok Sony.

People who think Sony doing this is a positve need a major reality check.

Hell this isn't even going to slow down piracy, if anything it will probably lead to a piracy solution quicker because Sony decided to anatagonize people who use Linux on the PS3... aka hackers... and also basically threw down a gauntlet to a bunch of other people.

Hardly matters.

First, there are no PS3s being produced that run Linux.

Second, the vast majority of owners who have an older PS3 will simply update the firmware with no regard for the loss of Linux as they, like the vast majority of PS3 owners, had no intention of ever installing Linux.

Add to these the older PS3s that are no longer working.

Ultimately, you're left with a shrinking number of consoles that are capable of having a hardware hack installed on an older console that can run Linux.

Net result: it makes a slightly larger niche market for old PS3s among the small community of users determined to play pirated games.

When found, this solution does nothing for the vast majority of PS3 owners who don't have an older PS3, aren't running Linux, don't have the hardware modifications made to their console and of course the simplest part of playing pirated games: don't have a PC with a BD burner and a stack of BD media.

You're left with a pretty insignificant number of potential pirates who have to leap through quite a few hoops just to play pirated games.

So someone gets a working solution to play pirated games on a software and hardware hacked PS3. Congrats. Really; congrats. It will have taken almost four years. The only benefit for the general public wlll be the inevitable Youtube videos displaying the achievement since it won't help all but a tiny niche of people who are very dedicated to playing pirated games.

SCE isn't concerned with this tiny niche of people that will go through more trouble than it's worth simply because they can.

They're concerned with general piracy among regular consumers who wouldn't have to do anything more than pay their local hardware hacker $50 to install a mod chip and supply them with $10 burned games.

Actually no.  I mean people will work to find a way to hack the actual PS3.  Or even find a way to reset and/or customize the firmware like PSP.


So instead of only old phat systems being able to pirate for the small amount of people who want to find an old PS3 to pirate... they open it up to where every PS3 may end up being pirateable.

Other OS was actually a good diversion to keep the hackers on.

As soon as it happens, and we see current production PS3s running pirated games, feel free to make a thread about it.

By the time we see a $50 mod chip and $10 BD burned games, the PS3 will be in its twilight years.

I'm not holding my breath and neither should you.

Couldn't I say the same to you?  Afterall there is NOT an actual hack that lets you play PS3 games via Other OS yet.

Which in of itself doesn't get around the fact that Sony is taking a feature away from the innocent that was already paid for, simply because someone else may abuse it.

No, because I'm not waiting for a hardware or software hack for the PS3. I buy games.

Even though I have a 60GB BC SKU running 3.20 firmware that I don't need to update because it's not my only PS3. If I want to use that to run Linux for whatever reason, I can.



greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:
greenmedic88 said:
Kasz216 said:

It was in the best intrests of the majority to remove a feature the majority never used and therefore were never at risk of anything... by screwing over a minority of people who used this and who are the only people effected.

Yeah... ok Sony.

People who think Sony doing this is a positve need a major reality check.

Hell this isn't even going to slow down piracy, if anything it will probably lead to a piracy solution quicker because Sony decided to anatagonize people who use Linux on the PS3... aka hackers... and also basically threw down a gauntlet to a bunch of other people.

Hardly matters.

First, there are no PS3s being produced that run Linux.

Second, the vast majority of owners who have an older PS3 will simply update the firmware with no regard for the loss of Linux as they, like the vast majority of PS3 owners, had no intention of ever installing Linux.

Add to these the older PS3s that are no longer working.

Ultimately, you're left with a shrinking number of consoles that are capable of having a hardware hack installed on an older console that can run Linux.

Net result: it makes a slightly larger niche market for old PS3s among the small community of users determined to play pirated games.

When found, this solution does nothing for the vast majority of PS3 owners who don't have an older PS3, aren't running Linux, don't have the hardware modifications made to their console and of course the simplest part of playing pirated games: don't have a PC with a BD burner and a stack of BD media.

You're left with a pretty insignificant number of potential pirates who have to leap through quite a few hoops just to play pirated games.

So someone gets a working solution to play pirated games on a software and hardware hacked PS3. Congrats. Really; congrats. It will have taken almost four years. The only benefit for the general public wlll be the inevitable Youtube videos displaying the achievement since it won't help all but a tiny niche of people who are very dedicated to playing pirated games.

SCE isn't concerned with this tiny niche of people that will go through more trouble than it's worth simply because they can.

They're concerned with general piracy among regular consumers who wouldn't have to do anything more than pay their local hardware hacker $50 to install a mod chip and supply them with $10 burned games.

Actually no.  I mean people will work to find a way to hack the actual PS3.  Or even find a way to reset and/or customize the firmware like PSP.


So instead of only old phat systems being able to pirate for the small amount of people who want to find an old PS3 to pirate... they open it up to where every PS3 may end up being pirateable.

Other OS was actually a good diversion to keep the hackers on.

As soon as it happens, and we see current production PS3s running pirated games, feel free to make a thread about it.

By the time we see a $50 mod chip and $10 BD burned games, the PS3 will be in its twilight years.

I'm not holding my breath and neither should you.

Couldn't I say the same to you?  Afterall there is NOT an actual hack that lets you play PS3 games via Other OS yet.

Which in of itself doesn't get around the fact that Sony is taking a feature away from the innocent that was already paid for, simply because someone else may abuse it.

No, because I'm not waiting for a hardware or software hack for the PS3. I buy games.

Even though I have a 60GB BC SKU running 3.20 firmware that I don't need to update because it's not my only PS3. If I want to use that to run Linux for whatever reason, I can.

i can fully agree with that situation ,while i also have multiple PS3's i know if i wanted to keep linux on my 60gb or 40 GB i can, i stll have my Slim for game's

some people may say i should not have to buy a second PS3 for a function I already paid good money for, on the same token I should not have to deal with hacker's making a system less secure because they felt the security and encryption should be open to everyone!

 



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.