- A 21 year old male gamer
- Joined on November 13th 2015, last online 20 hours ago.
- Profile Views: 4,173
- Forum posts: 1,457 times which averages 1 posts per day
- VG$ 880.00
A while ago you said "world war 2 ended when Hitler lost to Russia not because of the American nukes that was only for Japan". To me, this sounded like you were saying the entire Pacific Theater of WW2 was essentially just a side-show. Do you think that's a fair interpretation of what you said, or an unfair one? If the latter, why? And do you still stand by that statement?
You posted this in my thread and I thought it was kinda off-point but I wanted to answer it as well.
"Tell me one thing. If you know something, then how can you believe it. Believing something is completely different then knowing it. If this world really is a test to test our beliefs, then what would be the point of God revealing himself to is. Then we would not need to belief, we will know and hence the entire point of testing us would be nullified. God, if he exists, can not be perceived by us as he has made us this way. It's like how we can not percieve 4 dimensional or 5 dimensional beings. We have our limitations."
It would be very difficult if not impossible to not believe that which is known.
The test is whether or not to embrace God's commands though, right? If we don't even know if such a being exists at all then the test is invalid.
For example, even if I knew such a being existed I would have to choose whether or not to follow its commands. The revelation would not be problematic to this ultimate choice.
Most people I've encountered will claim that god is perceptible to us. I'm on your side on this one, it's like attempting to deal with an additional dimension.
However, because I'm in agreement with you on this I would expect you to agree that belief in this other dimension or this god is unreasonable since we have no reason to believe it's there.
This list only shows a selection of games from this user's favourite games.View all games
The streaming wars can continue for a while until everything;s refined in that end. Until then consoles and PC are the way to go. Frankly streaming working with low latency and required download speed is a threat to PC gaming before it is a threat to console gaming since exclusives will still exist....
kirby007 said: Eagle367 said: Laptops, smartphones, whenever I rarely watch on my switch. That's all the screens I have though. And the modem is some ZTE one and uses fiber optics Was going to say not being able to stream 240p must be a device issue but could be modem related if it happens on multiple devices. Because with that supposed speed you should be able to stream...
kirby007 said: Eagle367 said: I'll tell you when I understand it. It's supposed to be 1000Mbits down 100 up but sometimes I can't properly watch 240p. Thank Canada What kind of device? Laptops, smartphones, whenever I rarely watch on my switch. That's all the screens I have though. And the modem is some ZTE one and uses fiber optics...
Occupation: Physics student
Education: Currently doing honours physics B.Sc
University: McGill University, montreal, Canada
Eye colour: Brown
Hair colour: Black
Zodiac sign: Gemini
Relationship status: Single
Favourite Games: Megaman X series.
Favourite Music: Gintama music.
Anything that sounds good to me
Favourite Films: Can't choose. Love Wolverine, dark Knight and shawshanke
Favourite Books: Not a heavy reader.
Maybe How to read a book.
Favourite novel: Sherlock Holmes Canon
Favourite Food: Rosh(My region's dish. Search it online it's delicious)
About Me: How much more info do you need. Stop asking all these questions. Take time to get to know me.