Jumpin said:
That's not relevant; Bernie only continued with the DC primary because he promised to, the race was already lost, and he lost the DC primary spectacularly; largely because its outcome was irrelevant and voters wanted to show support to Clinton. Clinton won a majority and the popular vote on June 7th, and Elizabeth Warren's endorsement was announced on June 9th. What you're trying to argue is that there was some difference between Warren's endorsement and that of Bernie Sanders, which is purely fictional and a blatantly hypocritical narrative. The only difference is that Bernie was later. |
There is a difference. Warren had the chance to endorse Bernie earlier in the race but instead when the primaries were ending she endorsed Clinton which goes against what she had been fighting against.
Bernie endorsed Clinton after it was all said and done because his alternative was a Republican.
Basickly what i'm saying is that Warren had the opportunity to endorse Bernie and instead went to endorse Clinton at the end of the primary.
