By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
barneystinson69 said:
Puppyroach said:

Completely agree. I think we have a situation where every political party at the moment do not know how they are going to approach the immigration situation. And i would bet that the solutions SD are proposing are the most costly for society and for individuals rights.

Btw, great profile image :).

Your not getting enough immigrants? Wow... I'm done! If you seriously belive your country isn't getting enough... you know what, its your society's problem. 

That's not what we're saying at all.

Currently in sweden, the state decides how many immigrants that we can take in every year. The state is further divided, with the smallest divisions called communes. These communes can have their own policies and are currently allowed to take in zero immigrants if they so wish. This does not in any way affect the total number that the Swedish state takes in.

So what happens when communes can say no to taking in refugees? Some will say no because of economics, they want other communes to bear ther financial load. And others will say no because xenophobic local politicians were voted in. The result is that the communes that do not refuse refugees will have to take in everyone that the other ones refused. Leading to immigrant concentration, ghettos and the like.

Taking away the communes' rights to refuse refugees would NOT affect in any way the number of people that the swedish state takes in. All it would do is distribute the load evenly across the country and prevent ghettos from forming and growing. People would be forced to intermingle and integrate. Especially in schools.



I LOVE ICELAND!